On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 03:50:35PM -0700, Mina Almasry wrote: > Add a netdev_dmabuf_binding struct which represents the > dma-buf-to-netdevice binding. The netlink API will bind the dma-buf to > rx queues on the netdevice. On the binding, the dma_buf_attach > & dma_buf_map_attachment will occur. The entries in the sg_table from > mapping will be inserted into a genpool to make it ready > for allocation. > > The chunks in the genpool are owned by a dmabuf_chunk_owner struct which > holds the dma-buf offset of the base of the chunk and the dma_addr of > the chunk. Both are needed to use allocations that come from this chunk. > > We create a new type that represents an allocation from the genpool: > net_iov. We setup the net_iov allocation size in the > genpool to PAGE_SIZE for simplicity: to match the PAGE_SIZE normally > allocated by the page pool and given to the drivers. > > The user can unbind the dmabuf from the netdevice by closing the netlink > socket that established the binding. We do this so that the binding is > automatically unbound even if the userspace process crashes. > > The binding and unbinding leaves an indicator in struct netdev_rx_queue > that the given queue is bound, but the binding doesn't take effect until > the driver actually reconfigures its queues, and re-initializes its page > pool. > > The netdev_dmabuf_binding struct is refcounted, and releases its > resources only when all the refs are released. > > Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Kaiyuan Zhang <kaiyuanz@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@xxxxxxxxxx> ... > +int net_devmem_bind_dmabuf_to_queue(struct net_device *dev, u32 rxq_idx, > + struct net_devmem_dmabuf_binding *binding) > +{ > + struct netdev_rx_queue *rxq; > + u32 xa_idx; > + int err; > + > + if (rxq_idx >= dev->num_rx_queues) > + return -ERANGE; > + > + rxq = __netif_get_rx_queue(dev, rxq_idx); > + if (rxq->mp_params.mp_priv) > + return -EEXIST; > + > + err = xa_alloc(&binding->bound_rxq_list, &xa_idx, rxq, xa_limit_32b, > + GFP_KERNEL); > + if (err) > + return err; > + > + /* We hold the rtnl_lock while binding/unbinding dma-buf, so we can't > + * race with another thread that is also modifying this value. However, > + * the driver may read this config while it's creating its * rx-queues. > + * WRITE_ONCE() here to match the READ_ONCE() in the driver. > + */ > + WRITE_ONCE(rxq->mp_params.mp_ops, &dmabuf_devmem_ops); Hi Mina, This causes a build failure because mabuf_devmem_ops is not added until a subsequent patch in this series. > + WRITE_ONCE(rxq->mp_params.mp_priv, binding); > + > + err = net_devmem_restart_rx_queue(dev, rxq_idx); > + if (err) > + goto err_xa_erase; > + > + return 0; > + > +err_xa_erase: > + WRITE_ONCE(rxq->mp_params.mp_ops, NULL); > + WRITE_ONCE(rxq->mp_params.mp_priv, NULL); > + xa_erase(&binding->bound_rxq_list, xa_idx); > + > + return err; > +} ...