On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 07:28:30AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Laurent Pinchart > <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > > > On Saturday 10 August 2013 06:45:05 Dave Airlie wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 03:34:17AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >> >> Hi Dave, > >> >> > >> >> (CC'ing Simon Horman, the shmobile tree maintainer) > >> >> > >> >> On Thursday 08 August 2013 10:57:33 Dave Airlie wrote: > >> >> > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >> >> > > Hi Dave, > >> >> > > > >> >> > > I've got a couple of arch/arm/ patches that depend on this series and > >> >> > > that I would like to get merged in v3.12. They should go upstream > >> >> > > through the arm-soc tree. Would you be able to provide a stable > >> >> > > branch with this patch set based on one of the 3.11-rcX tags ? > >> >> > > Ideally that branch should have as little patches as possible other > >> >> > > than this set. > >> >> > > >> >> > Yeah that shouldn't be a problem, though is there any interface changes > >> >> > or things with this wrt drm-next? > >> >> > > >> >> > i.e. will this tree build on v3.11-rcX and drm-next? > >> >> > >> >> They depend on a fix that went in between -rc1 and -rc2. You can base the > >> >> branch on any -rc >= 2. > >> > > >> > An rc2 or rc3 base would be ideal for me, but any rc would be fine. > >> > >> So the problem with making a stable branch is we have conflicts in other > >> places that have already been solved in drm-next, > >> > >> is there any problem with using Laurent's tree directly as the stable point? > > > > As agreed on IRC, I've rebased the patches on top of v3.11-rc3 and pushed the > > result to > > > > git://linuxtv.org/pinchartl/fbdev.git drm/next/du > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Kconfig | 7 > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/Makefile | 10 - > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.c | 255 +++++++++++++------------- > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.h | 13 - > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c | 173 +++++++----------- > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.h | 63 +++++- > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_encoder.c | 202 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_encoder.h | 49 +++++ > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_group.c | 187 ++++++++++++++++++++ > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_group.h | 50 +++++ > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_kms.c | 165 ++++++++++-------- > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_kms.h | 29 --- > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvdscon.c | 131 ++++++++++++++ > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvdscon.h | 25 ++ > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvdsenc.c | 196 +++++++++++++++++++++ > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvdsenc.h | 46 +++++ > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_plane.c | 170 +++++++++--------- > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_plane.h | 26 ++ > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_regs.h | 94 ++++++++-- > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vgacon.c | 96 ++++++++++ > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vgacon.h | 23 ++ > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_lvds_regs.h | 69 +++++++ > > b/include/linux/platform_data/rcar-du.h | 34 ++- > > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvds.c | 216 ----------------------- > > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_lvds.h | 24 -- > > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vga.c | 149 ---------------- > > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vga.h | 24 -- > > 27 files changed, 1665 insertions(+), 861 deletions(-) > > > > Can you merge that into drm-next ? Simon, you can base the r8a7790 arch/ > > patches on top of this drm/next/du branch. > > Actually small change > > Simon can you use > > git://git.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux drm-rcar-for-v3.12 > > as I've merged this tree with an S-o-b on the merge commit, so other > people will know it has gone via me. Sorry for the delayed response. I had assumed that the reason I was having trouble fetching the remote above was related to the internet connection at the end of the world that I was in turn at the end while on holidays. However, it seems that I am unable to fetch the remote from my office either. This may well be a fault at my end, but its not something I can readily think of a work around for other than trying from home a little later. # git remote add airlied git://git.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux # git fetch airlied fatal: Could not read from remote repository. Please make sure you have the correct access rights and the repository exists. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
