On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 03:34:17AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >> Hi Dave, >> >> (CC'ing Simon Horman, the shmobile tree maintainer) >> >> On Thursday 08 August 2013 10:57:33 Dave Airlie wrote: >> > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >> > > Hi Dave, >> > > >> > > I've got a couple of arch/arm/ patches that depend on this series and that >> > > I would like to get merged in v3.12. They should go upstream through the >> > > arm-soc tree. Would you be able to provide a stable branch with this >> > > patch set based on one of the 3.11-rcX tags ? Ideally that branch should >> > > have as little patches as possible other than this set. >> > >> > Yeah that shouldn't be a problem, though is there any interface changes or >> > things with this wrt drm-next? >> > >> > i.e. will this tree build on v3.11-rcX and drm-next? >> >> They depend on a fix that went in between -rc1 and -rc2. You can base the >> branch on any -rc >= 2. > > An rc2 or rc3 base would be ideal for me, but any rc would be fine. So the problem with making a stable branch is we have conflicts in other places that have already been solved in drm-next, is there any problem with using Laurent's tree directly as the stable point? Dave. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
