Document API functions for suppressing warning backtraces.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
- Rebased to v6.9-rc1
- Added Tested-by:, Acked-by:, and Reviewed-by: tags
Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
index 22955d56b379..8d3d36d4103d 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
@@ -157,6 +157,34 @@ Alternatively, one can take full control over the error message by using
if (some_setup_function())
KUNIT_FAIL(test, "Failed to setup thing for testing");
+Suppressing warning backtraces
+------------------------------
+
+Some unit tests trigger warning backtraces either intentionally or as side
+effect. Such backtraces are normally undesirable since they distract from
+the actual test and may result in the impression that there is a problem.
+
+Such backtraces can be suppressed. To suppress a backtrace in some_function(),
+use the following code.
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+ static void some_test(struct kunit *test)
+ {
+ DEFINE_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(some_function);
+
+ START_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(some_function);
+ trigger_backtrace();
+ END_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(some_function);
+ }
+
+SUPPRESSED_WARNING_COUNT() returns the number of suppressed backtraces. If the
+suppressed backtrace was triggered on purpose, this can be used to check if
+the backtrace was actually triggered.
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, SUPPRESSED_WARNING_COUNT(some_function), 1);
Test Suites
~~~~~~~~~~~
@@ -857,4 +885,4 @@ For example:
dev_managed_string = devm_kstrdup(fake_device, "Hello, World!");
// Everything is cleaned up automatically when the test ends.
- }
\ No newline at end of file
+ }
--
2.39.2
