On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 11:22:22AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 22/03/2024 19:05, Conor Dooley wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 06:59:18AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> On 21/03/2024 21:43, Anatoliy Klymenko wrote: > >>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/media/media-bus-format.h b/include/dt-bindings/media/media-bus-format.h > >>> new file mode 100644 > >>> index 000000000000..60fc6e11dabc > >>> --- /dev/null > >>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/media/media-bus-format.h > >>> @@ -0,0 +1,177 @@ > >>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR MIT) */ > >>> +/* > >>> + * Media Bus API header > >>> + * > >>> + * Copyright (C) 2009, Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@xxxxxx> > >>> + * > >>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify > >>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as > >>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation. > >> > >> That's not true. Your SPDX tells something entirely different. > >> > >> Anyway, you did not explain why you need to copy anything anywhere. > > > > I assume by "copy anything anywhere" you mean "why did you copy a linux > > uapi header into the bindings? > > Yes, I trimmed context too much. > > The reasoning of copying some UAPI and claiming it is a binding was: > "Copy media-bus-formats.h into dt-bindings/media to suplement TPG DT node." > so as seen *there is no reason*. > > Commit msg should explain why we are doing things. Oh for sure. I was just wondering if you were complaining about the UAPI header or if that comment was about the copyright notice. If it had been the latter I was gonna point out the former :)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
