Hi,
On 2024/3/18 23:33, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Sui,
Thank you for the patch.
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 01:28:00AM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
To reduce boilerplate, use of_graph_get_remote_node() helper instead of
the hand-rolling code.
Signed-off-by: Sui Jingfeng <sui.jingfeng@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/thc63lvd1024.c | 24 +++---------------------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/thc63lvd1024.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/thc63lvd1024.c
index d4c1a601bbb5..5f99f9724081 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/thc63lvd1024.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/thc63lvd1024.c
@@ -123,28 +123,10 @@ static int thc63_parse_dt(struct thc63_dev *thc63)
struct device_node *endpoint;
struct device_node *remote;
- endpoint = of_graph_get_endpoint_by_regs(thc63->dev->of_node,
- THC63_RGB_OUT0, -1);
- if (!endpoint) {
- dev_err(thc63->dev, "Missing endpoint in port@%u\n",
- THC63_RGB_OUT0);
- return -ENODEV;
- }
-
- remote = of_graph_get_remote_port_parent(endpoint);
- of_node_put(endpoint);
- if (!remote) {
- dev_err(thc63->dev, "Endpoint in port@%u unconnected\n",
- THC63_RGB_OUT0);
+ remote = of_graph_get_remote_node(thc63->dev->of_node,
+ THC63_RGB_OUT0, -1);
+ if (!remote)
The old logic is equivalent to of_graph_get_remote_node(), but now the
driver will fail probing without an error message. That's not very nice
as it leads to difficult to debug problems. I would keep one dev_err()
here:
dev_err(thc63->dev, "No remote endpoint for port@%u\n",
THC63_RGB_OUT0);
As your patch has been merged already, would you like to post a
follow-up patch to fix this ?
Yes, this is indeed a difference. I will post a follow-up patch to fix this.
return -ENODEV;
- }
-
- if (!of_device_is_available(remote)) {
- dev_err(thc63->dev, "port@%u remote endpoint is disabled\n",
- THC63_RGB_OUT0);
- of_node_put(remote);
- return -ENODEV;
- }
thc63->next = of_drm_find_bridge(remote);
of_node_put(remote);
--
Best regards,
Sui
