On 15/03/2024 08:18, Vignesh Raman wrote:
Hi Helen,
On 07/03/24 19:32, Helen Koike wrote:
On 06/03/2024 00:06, Vignesh Raman wrote:
For rockchip rk3288 and rk3399, the display driver is rockchip.
Currently, in drm-ci for rockchip, only the display driver is
tested. Refactor the existing rockchip jobs so that gpu driver
testing jobs can be added later and update xfails accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raman <vignesh.raman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
v2:
- Refactor the patch to rename job to indicate display driver
testing,
rename the existing xfail files.
v3:
- Add the job name in GPU_VERSION and use it for xfail file names
instead of using DRIVER_NAME. Also update xfails.
v4:
- Remove the display suffix in job and rename xfails accordingly.
Remove the change adding job name in GPU_VERSION.
---
drivers/gpu/drm/ci/test.yml | 36 ++++++++----
.../drm/ci/xfails/rockchip-rk3288-fails.txt | 58 ++++++-------------
.../drm/ci/xfails/rockchip-rk3288-flakes.txt | 20 +++++++
.../drm/ci/xfails/rockchip-rk3288-skips.txt | 54 ++---------------
.../drm/ci/xfails/rockchip-rk3399-fails.txt | 38 ++++++------
.../drm/ci/xfails/rockchip-rk3399-flakes.txt | 28 +++++++--
.../drm/ci/xfails/rockchip-rk3399-skips.txt | 5 +-
7 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 129 deletions(-)
create mode 100644
drivers/gpu/drm/ci/xfails/rockchip-rk3288-flakes.txt
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ci/test.yml b/drivers/gpu/drm/ci/test.yml
index 6ae6398b3d88..831e580e6dfd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ci/test.yml
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ci/test.yml
@@ -153,33 +153,45 @@ msm:sdm845:
script:
- ./install/bare-metal/cros-servo.sh
-rockchip:rk3288:
- extends:
- - .lava-igt:arm32
+.rockchip:
stage: rockchip
variables:
- DRIVER_NAME: rockchip
Looks like it make sense to keep DRIVER_NAME here, no?
- DEVICE_TYPE: rk3288-veyron-jaq
DTB: ${DEVICE_TYPE}
BOOT_METHOD: depthcharge
+
+.rk3288:
+ extends:
+ - .lava-igt:arm32
+ - .rockchip
Maybe, instead of extending .rockchip here, make .rockchip tied to the
DRIVER_NAME and .rk3288 tied to the GPU_VERSION, and on
rockchip:rk3288 you can extend both .rockchip and .rk3288, what do you
think?
So rockchip:rk3399 you can extend .rockchip and .rk3399.
and in the panfrost one you can have a .panfrost (that can extend
.rockchip if they are the same definition).
I feel it becomes less confusing, what do you think?
I would even add some prefix or suffix to make it less confusing, like
.driver-rockchip and .gpu-rk3288 for instance, making it a bit more
intuitive and helping our future selves :)
Thanks for the suggestion. This can be done. Should we do it only
for rockchip jobs or others also (meson, mediatek) ?
I guess we could keep the same patter for all the make sense.
Helen
+ variables:
+ DEVICE_TYPE: rk3288-veyron-jaq
KERNEL_IMAGE_TYPE: "zimage"
- GPU_VERSION: rk3288
Looks like it make sense to keep GPU_VERSION here, no? Same comment
for .rk3399.
Yes, will fix this.
Regards,
Vignesh
