Re: [PATCH] backlight: lp8788: Drop support for platform data

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 01:48:27PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/lp8788_bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/lp8788_bl.c
> index 31f97230ee50..f3a89677c31c 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/backlight/lp8788_bl.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/lp8788_bl.c
> @@ -12,7 +12,6 @@
>  #include <linux/mfd/lp8788.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> -#include <linux/pwm.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  
>  /* Register address */
> @@ -31,149 +30,41 @@
>  #define MAX_BRIGHTNESS			127
>  #define DEFAULT_BL_NAME			"lcd-backlight"
>  
> -struct lp8788_bl_config {
> -	enum lp8788_bl_ctrl_mode bl_mode;
> -	enum lp8788_bl_dim_mode dim_mode;
> -	enum lp8788_bl_full_scale_current full_scale;
> -	enum lp8788_bl_ramp_step rise_time;
> -	enum lp8788_bl_ramp_step fall_time;
> -	enum pwm_polarity pwm_pol;
> -};
> -
>  struct lp8788_bl {
>  	struct lp8788 *lp;
>  	struct backlight_device *bl_dev;
> -	struct lp8788_backlight_platform_data *pdata;
> -	enum lp8788_bl_ctrl_mode mode;
>  	struct pwm_device *pwm;

Actually this pwm_device member should be dropped, too. I wonder why
this even passes a W=1 build without a warning ...

@Lee: Feel free to fix this up while applying, or tell me if you prefer
an incremental fixup or a complete v2.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux