On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 04:11:54PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > Hi > > Am 05.03.24 um 17:25 schrieb Jani Nikula: > > On Tue, 05 Mar 2024, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 02:42:55PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > > > > Unregister all in-kernel clients before unloading the i915 driver. For > > > > other drivers, drm_dev_unregister() does this automatically. As i915 > > > > does not use this helper, it has to perform the call by itself. For xe, > > > > do the same in xe_device_remove() > > > > > > > > Note that there are currently no in-kernel clients in i915 or xe. The > > > > patch prepares the drivers for a related update of their fbdev support. > > > > > > > > v7: > > > > * update xe driver > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c | 3 +++ > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c | 3 +++ > > > > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c > > > > index 9ee902d5b72c4..97910a85e3917 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c > > > > @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ > > > > #include <drm/drm_aperture.h> > > > > #include <drm/drm_atomic_helper.h> > > > > +#include <drm/drm_client.h> > > > > #include <drm/drm_ioctl.h> > > > > #include <drm/drm_managed.h> > > > > #include <drm/drm_probe_helper.h> > > > > @@ -852,6 +853,8 @@ void i915_driver_remove(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > > > { > > > > intel_wakeref_t wakeref; > > > > + drm_client_dev_unregister(&i915->drm); > > > > + > > > > wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get(&i915->runtime_pm); > > > > i915_driver_unregister(i915); > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c > > > > index 919ad88f0495a..7f41f0ec819f0 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c > > > probably deserves a separate patch since this is one here is named 'drm/i915:' > > Or do this for both in intel_display_driver_unregister()? > > Ok, sure. I'll update this. I also have to update i915 and xe in patches 5 > and 6. I don't see how I can change them individually. How would I best log > against both of them? drm/{i915,xe}? or drm/intel? hmmm... though one... drm-intel is the name of the i915 repository well, perhaps drm/{i915,xe} works or maybe just drm/i915/display: because since display is shared, that kind of "tag" would be an indication that xe needs it as well anyway. > > Best regards > Thomas > > > > > BR, > > Jani. > > > > > > > > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ > > > > #include <drm/drm_aperture.h> > > > > #include <drm/drm_atomic_helper.h> > > > > +#include <drm/drm_client.h> > > > > #include <drm/drm_gem_ttm_helper.h> > > > > #include <drm/drm_ioctl.h> > > > > #include <drm/drm_managed.h> > > > > @@ -614,6 +615,8 @@ void xe_device_remove(struct xe_device *xe) > > > > struct xe_gt *gt; > > > > u8 id; > > > > + drm_client_dev_unregister(&xe->drm); > > > > + > > > > xe_device_remove_display(xe); > > > > xe_display_fini(xe); > > > > -- > > > > 2.43.2 > > > > > > -- > -- > Thomas Zimmermann > Graphics Driver Developer > SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH > Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany > GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew Myers, Andrew McDonald, Boudien Moerman > HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg) >