Hi Janusz,
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 12:32:40PM +0100, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> Third argument of i915_request_wait() accepts a timeout value in jiffies.
> Most users pass either a simple HZ based expression, or a result of
> msecs_to_jiffies(), or MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT, or a very small number not
> exceeding 4 if applicable as that value. However, there is one user --
> intel_selftest_wait_for_rq() -- that passes a WAIT_FOR_RESET_TIME symbol,
> defined as a large constant value that most probably represents a desired
> timeout in ms. While that usage results in the intended value of timeout
> on usual x86_64 kernel configurations, it is not portable across different
> architectures and custom kernel configs.
>
> Rename the symbol to clearly indicate intended units and convert it to
> jiffies before use.
>
> Fixes: 3a4bfa091c46 ("drm/i915/selftest: Fix workarounds selftest for GuC submission")
> Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Rahul Kumar Singh <rahul.kumar.singh@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@xxxxxxxxx>
pushed in drm-intel-gt-next.
Thank you,
Andi
