Re: [PATCH 1/3] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing
From: Guenter Roeck <groeck@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 09:22:59 -0800
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Nikolai Kondrashov <spbnick@xxxxxxxxx>, Helen Koike <helen.koike@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linuxtv-ci@xxxxxxxxxxx, dave.pigott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, gustavo.padovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, pawiecz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, tales.aparecida@xxxxxxxxx, workflows@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kernelci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kunit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, nfraprado@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx, cocci@xxxxxxxx, Julia.Lawall@xxxxxxxx, laura.nao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, ricardo.canuelo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20240304-benevolent-brawny-urchin-0af0ad@houat>
References: <20240228225527.1052240-1-helen.koike@collabora.com> <20240228225527.1052240-2-helen.koike@collabora.com> <20240229-dancing-laughing-groundhog-d85161@houat> <5d7ed81b-37f9-48e9-ab7e-484b74ca886c@gmail.com> <CAHk-=wixVy3WYvjbt43ZSrCqPDsS76QJQSkXFbbPsAOs1MCSAQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABXOdTeT2ip1uS2EG2w8pW7254Tnd=ZDNz-KC61-G-yqDTVgJA@mail.gmail.com> <20240304-rigorous-silkworm-of-awe-4eee8f@houat> <CABXOdTc4MXcjwgGuJb4_69-4OFELD37x0B6oMr=4z=nxZ2HPXQ@mail.gmail.com> <20240304-ludicrous-grinning-goldfish-090aac@houat> <CABXOdTeDydWO9mf2yxWjjebHZ1bE=R2HPs1P4XYwNhzznNKxmw@mail.gmail.com> <20240304-benevolent-brawny-urchin-0af0ad@houat>

On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 9:09 AM Maxime Ripard <mripard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> And singling out DRM because it regularly allegedly breaks things on
> xtensa or m68k and claiming we're not taking CI seriously because of it
> is completely ridiculous. If the all the subsystems were taking CI as
> seriously as DRM, we would be in a much better place.
>

The failure I reported as an example was on arm, not on xtensa or m68k
I'll disable CONFIG_DRM in my build tests for xtensa and m68k going
forward.

Thanks,
Guenter

References:
- [PATCH 0/3] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing
  - From: Helen Koike
- [PATCH 1/3] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing
  - From: Helen Koike
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing
  - From: Maxime Ripard
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing
  - From: Nikolai Kondrashov
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing
  - From: Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing
  - From: Guenter Roeck
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing
  - From: Maxime Ripard
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing
  - From: Guenter Roeck
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing
  - From: Maxime Ripard
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing
  - From: Guenter Roeck
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing
  - From: Maxime Ripard

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] drm/panel: panel-edp: Add prepare_to_enable to 200ms for MNC207QS1-1
Next by Date: [PATCH] drm/drm_connector: Document Colorspace property variants
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/3] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/3] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux DRI Users] [Linux Intel Graphics] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86]