Hi,
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 10:00:19PM +0000, Klymenko, Anatoliy wrote:
> > > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_modeset_helper_vtables.h
> > > b/include/drm/drm_modeset_helper_vtables.h
> > > index 881b03e4dc28..7c21ae1fe3ad 100644
> > > --- a/include/drm/drm_modeset_helper_vtables.h
> > > +++ b/include/drm/drm_modeset_helper_vtables.h
> > > @@ -489,6 +489,37 @@ struct drm_crtc_helper_funcs {
> > > bool in_vblank_irq, int *vpos, int *hpos,
> > > ktime_t *stime, ktime_t *etime,
> > > const struct drm_display_mode *mode);
> > > +
> > > + /**
> > > + * @select_output_bus_format
> > > + *
> > > + * Called by the first connected DRM bridge to negotiate input media
> > > + * bus format. CRTC is expected to pick preferable media formats from
> > > + * the list supported by the DRM bridge chain.
> >
> > There's nothing restricting it to bridges here. Please rephrase this to remove the
> > bridge mention. The user is typically going to be the encoder, and bridges are just
> > an automagic implementation of an encoder.
> >
>
> OK. I'll fix than in the next version.
>
> > And generally speaking, I'd really like to have an implementation available before
> > merging this.
> >
>
> Well, 2 instances of this callback implementations exist as drafts, as
> this is the new API. A little bit of a chicken and egg problem. I'll
> try to groom at least one of them into upstreamable shape and attach
> it to the patch set.
That's totally what I meant :)
I basically don't want to have an interface that isn't used. If you
provide an implementation in the same series, it's totally reasonable
Maxime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
