On 28/02/2024 11:18, Dharma.B@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On 28/02/24 12:43 pm, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe >> >> On 28/02/2024 07:59, Dharma.B@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> I don't know what's this exactly, but if embedded display then maybe >>>> could be part of this device node. If some other display, then maybe you >>>> need another schema, with compatible? But first I would check how others >>>> are doing this. >>> >>> Okay, then I think the driver also needs to be modified, currently the >>> driver parses the phandle and looks for these properties. Also the >>> corresponding dts files. >> >> Driver does not have to be modified in my proposal. You would still have >> phandle. > > If I understand correctly, I could define the dt bindings as below > > display: > $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle > description: A phandle pointing to the display node. > > panel: > $ref: panel/panel-common.yaml# > properties: > So these are standard panel bindings? Then the node should live outside of lcdc. If current driver needs to poke inside panel and panel could be anything, then probably you need peripheral-props-like approach. :/ Best regards, Krzysztof
