Re: [PATCH 01/18] ASoC: dt-bindings: mediatek,mt8365-afe: Add audio afe document

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 27/02/2024 10:01, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 26/02/2024 15:01, Alexandre Mergnat wrote:
Add MT8365 audio front-end bindings

Signed-off-by: Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  .../bindings/sound/mediatek,mt8365-afe.yaml        | 164 +++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 164 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/mediatek,mt8365-afe.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/mediatek,mt8365-afe.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..1d7eb2532ad2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/mediatek,mt8365-afe.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,164 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/sound/mediatek,mt8365-afe.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: MediaTek AFE PCM controller for MT8365
+
+maintainers:
+  - Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
+
+properties:
+  compatible:
+    const: mediatek,mt8365-afe-pcm
+
+  reg:
+    maxItems: 2

You must describe the items.

Actually, I've took downstream code that I'm not able to explain because the second reg isn't on my MTK documentation. So I've remove the second reg and passed all functional tests successfully. Then I will remove the extra reg for v2.


+
+  interrupts:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  mediatek,topckgen:
+    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
+    description: The phandle of the mediatek topckgen controller

What for? Don't repeat the property name. Say something useful.

got it


+
+  power-domains:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  "#sound-dai-cells":
+    const: 0
+
+  clocks:
+    items:
+      - description: 26M clock
+      - description: mux for audio clock
+      - description: audio i2s0 mck
+      - description: audio i2s1 mck
+      - description: audio i2s2 mck
+      - description: audio i2s3 mck
+      - description: engen 1 clock
+      - description: engen 2 clock
+      - description: audio 1 clock
+      - description: audio 2 clock
+      - description: mux for i2s0
+      - description: mux for i2s1
+      - description: mux for i2s2
+      - description: mux for i2s3
+
+  clock-names:
+    items:
+      - const: top_clk26m_clk
+      - const: top_audio_sel
+      - const: audio_i2s0_m
+      - const: audio_i2s1_m
+      - const: audio_i2s2_m
+      - const: audio_i2s3_m
+      - const: engen1
+      - const: engen2
+      - const: aud1
+      - const: aud2
+      - const: i2s0_m_sel
+      - const: i2s1_m_sel
+      - const: i2s2_m_sel
+      - const: i2s3_m_sel
+
+  mediatek,i2s-shared-clock:

Why do you need this property? Linux (and other systems) handle sharing
clocks properly.

Indeed, not needed. It was used by the downstream code driver but I remove it for v2.


+    description:
+      i2s modules can share the same external clock pin.
+      If this property is not present the clock mode is separrate.

Typo

+    type: boolean
+
+  mediatek,dmic-iir-on:
+    description:
+      Boolean which specifies whether the DMIC IIR is enabled.
+      If this property is not present the IIR is disabled.

"is enabled" or "enable it"?

You described the desired Linux feature or behavior, not the actual
hardware. The bindings are about the latter, so instead you need to
rephrase the property and its description to match actual hardware
capabilities/features/configuration etc.

I will rephrase:

True to enable the Infinite Impulse Response (IIR) filter
on the digital microphone inputs.


+    type: boolean
+
+  mediatek,dmic-irr-mode:
+    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
+    description:
+      Selects stop band of IIR DC-removal filter.
+      0 = Software programmable custom coeff loaded by the driver.

Bindings are for hardware, not drivers. Why is this a property of board DTS?

Actually this is a hardware feature. Mode 1 t 5 are predefined filters. Mode 0, the HW will read some "coef filter registers" to setup the custom filter. the "coef filter regs" are written by the driver. Currently the coef values are hardcoded in the driver.


+      1 = 5Hz if 48KHz mode.
+      2 = 10Hz if 48KHz mode.
+      3 = 25Hz if 48KHz mode.
+      4 = 50Hz if 48KHz mode.
+      5 = 65Hz if 48KHz mode.

Use proper unit suffixes - hz.


+    enum:
+      - 0
+      - 1
+      - 2
+      - 3
+      - 4
+      - 5
+
+  mediatek,dmic-two-wire-mode:
+    description:
+      Boolean which turns on digital microphone for two wire mode.
+      If this property is not present the two wire mode is disabled.

This looks like hardware property, but the naming looks like SW. Again
you instruct what driver should do. Standard disclaimer:

You described the desired Linux feature or behavior, not the actual
hardware. The bindings are about the latter, so instead you need to
rephrase the property and its description to match actual hardware
capabilities/features/configuration etc.

Actually this is a hardware feature. This is ALL I have to describe the HW behavior from the datasheet:
"
bit name: ul_dmic_two_wire_ctl
Turns on digital microphone for two wire mode.
0: Turn off
1: Turn on
"

On the board schematic, SoC and DMIC and linked by 3 pins:
- clk
- data0
- data1

IMHO, "two-wire-mode" means the HW use 2 pins for data, and the SoC must be aware of that by reading the register value written by the driver, using the value found in the DTS.

I don't get why you think it wouldn't be hardware behavior.

Rephrase description:
"True to enable the two wire mode of the digital microphone"
Is it better ?

About the property name, "mediatek,dmic-two-wire-ctl" sound better for you ?



+    type: boolean
+
+

Just one blank line.

+required:
+  - compatible
+  - reg
+  - interrupts
+  - power-domains
+  - mediatek,topckgen
+  - clocks
+  - clock-names
+
+additionalProperties: false
+
+examples:
+  - |
+    #include <dt-bindings/clock/mediatek,mt8365-clk.h>
+    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
+    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
+    #include <dt-bindings/power/mediatek,mt8365-power.h>
+
+    soc {
+        #address-cells = <2>;
+        #size-cells = <2>;
+
+        afe@11220000 {

What is AFE?

Audio Front End, this is the same name used for other MTK SoC, to be consistent.

Cook a new patch serie to change "afe" by "audio-controller" for all MTK SoC would be great.


https://devicetree-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/chapter2-devicetree-basics.html#generic-names-recommendation


+            compatible = "mediatek,mt8365-afe-pcm";


Best regards,
Krzysztof


--
Regards,
Alexandre



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux