Hi David,
Thanks for fixing kernel/time/time_test.c
Best wishes,
Cassio.
On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 at 09:28, David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
'days' is a s64 (from div_s64), and so should use a %lld specifier.
This was found by extending KUnit's assertion macros to use gcc's
__printf attribute.
Fixes: 276010551664 ("time: Improve performance of time64_to_tm()")
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/time/time_test.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/time_test.c b/kernel/time/time_test.c
index ca058c8af6ba..3e5d422dd15c 100644
--- a/kernel/time/time_test.c
+++ b/kernel/time/time_test.c
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static void time64_to_tm_test_date_range(struct kunit *test)
days = div_s64(secs, 86400);
- #define FAIL_MSG "%05ld/%02d/%02d (%2d) : %ld", \
+ #define FAIL_MSG "%05ld/%02d/%02d (%2d) : %lld", \
year, month, mdday, yday, days
KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, year - 1900, result.tm_year, FAIL_MSG);
--
2.44.0.rc0.258.g7320e95886-goog
