On 14.02.2024 10:50, neil.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On 14/02/2024 10:33, Luca Weiss wrote: >> On Mon Jan 22, 2024 at 12:27 PM CET, Luca Weiss wrote: >>> On Fri Jan 12, 2024 at 11:26 AM CET, wrote: >>>> On 12/01/2024 11:23, Linus Walleij wrote: >>>>> On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 10:52 AM Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Since there's zero indication Truly is involved in this panel in my >>>>>> documentation - much less the number 5P65 - I'm not going to add that. >>>> >>>> Ack >>>> >>>>> >>>>> OK then, I fold, thanks for looking into it. >>>>> Keep the Himax hx83112a file name and symbols. >>>>> >>>>>> So in short this panel is the model 9A-3R063-1102B from DJN, which uses >>>>>> a Himax HX83112A driver IC. >>>>> >>>>> So compatible = "djn,9a-3r063-1102b" since the setup sequences for >>>>> hx83112a are clearly for this one display? >>>> >>>> Yep let's settle on that! >>> >> >> Hi Neil and Linus, >> >> Any feedback about the below question? >> >> Regards >> Luca >> >>> It's clear to me to use "djn,9a-3r063-1102b" in the driver now but what >>> about dts? >>> >>> Currently here in v2 we have this: >>> compatible = "fairphone,fp4-hx83112a-djn", "himax,hx83112a"; >>> >>> Should this just become this? >>> compatible = "djn,9a-3r063-1102b"; >>> >>> Or e.g. this? >>> compatible = "djn,9a-3r063-1102b", "himax,hx83112a"; >>> >>> Or something else completely? Do we have some documentation / best >>> practises around this maybe? > > Sorry I totally missed the question. > > Not sure if "himax,hx83112a" is needed here, the "djn,9a-3r063-1102b" is enough to know the IC is hx83112a. > > I don't think you'll ever find a "djn,9a-3r063-1102b" with another controller IC ? > > And "himax,hx83112a" alone as fallback is not enough to describe the panel hardware, so I think it should be dropped. +1 Konrad
