On Sat, 10 Feb 2024 at 11:37, Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, 10 Feb 2024 at 03:53, Paloma Arellano <quic_parellan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > YUV420 format is supported only in the VSC SDP packet and not through > > MSA. Hence add an API which indicates the sink support which can be used > > by the rest of the DP programming. > > > > Changes in v2: > > - Move VSC SDP support check API from dp_panel.c to > > drm_dp_helper.c > > > > Signed-off-by: Paloma Arellano <quic_parellan@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ > > include/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.h | 1 + > > 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c > > index d72b6f9a352c1..c6ee0f9ab5f8f 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c > > @@ -2917,6 +2917,27 @@ void drm_dp_vsc_sdp_log(const char *level, struct device *dev, > > } > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_vsc_sdp_log); > > > > +/** > > + * drm_dp_vsc_sdp_supported() - check if vsc sdp is supported > > + * @aux: DisplayPort AUX channel > > + * @dpcd: DisplayPort configuration data > > + * > > + * Returns true if vsc sdp is supported, else returns false > > + */ > > +bool drm_dp_vsc_sdp_supported(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, const u8 dpcd[DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE]) > > +{ > > + u8 rx_feature; > > + > > + if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(aux, DP_DPRX_FEATURE_ENUMERATION_LIST, &rx_feature) != 1) { > > + drm_dbg_dp(aux->drm_dev, "failed to read DP_DPRX_FEATURE_ENUMERATION_LIST\n"); > > + return false; > > + } > > + > > + return (dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] >= DP_DPCD_REV_13) && > > + !!(rx_feature & DP_VSC_SDP_EXT_FOR_COLORIMETRY_SUPPORTED); > > Nit: we don't even need the `!!` here. I'll probably drop it while applying. > > Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx> Also the prefix should be drm/display/dp, not drm/msm/dp. Could you please send this patch separately to dri-devel, fixing the prefix, dropping double inversion and adding Intel people to cc? We'd need an ack from the drm core team to get this applied. > > > > +} > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_vsc_sdp_supported); > > + > > /** > > * drm_dp_get_pcon_max_frl_bw() - maximum frl supported by PCON > > * @dpcd: DisplayPort configuration data > > diff --git a/include/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.h b/include/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.h > > index 863b2e7add29e..948381b2b0b1b 100644 > > --- a/include/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.h > > +++ b/include/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.h > > @@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ struct drm_dp_vsc_sdp { > > > > void drm_dp_vsc_sdp_log(const char *level, struct device *dev, > > const struct drm_dp_vsc_sdp *vsc); > > +bool drm_dp_vsc_sdp_supported(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, const u8 dpcd[DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE]); > > > > int drm_dp_psr_setup_time(const u8 psr_cap[EDP_PSR_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE]); > > > > -- > > 2.39.2 > > > > > -- > With best wishes > Dmitry -- With best wishes Dmitry