HI Boris：
在 2024-02-05 17:03:21，"Boris Brezillon" <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 写道： >+Danilo for the panthor gpuvm-needs update. > >On Sun, 4 Feb 2024 09:14:44 +0800 (CST) >"Andy Yan" <andyshrk@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Hi Boris： >> I saw this warning sometimes（Run on a armbain based bookworm），not sure is a know issue or something else。 >> [15368.293031] systemd-journald[715]: Received client request to relinquish /var/log/journal/1bc4a340506142af9bd31a6a3d2170ba access. >> [37743.040737] ------------[ cut here ]------------ >> [37743.040764] panthor fb000000.gpu: drm_WARN_ON(shmem->pages_use_count) >> [37743.040890] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 5702 at drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c:158 drm_gem_shmem_free+0x144/0x14c [drm_shmem_helper] >> [37743.040929] Modules linked in: joydev rfkill sunrpc lz4hc lz4 zram binfmt_misc hantro_vpu crct10dif_ce v4l2_vp9 v4l2_h264 snd_soc_simple_amplifier v4l2_mem2mem videobuf2_dma_contig snd_soc_es8328_i2c videobuf2_memops rk_crypto2 snd_soc_es8328 videobuf2_v4l2 sm3_generic videodev crypto_engine sm3 rockchip_rng videobuf2_common nvmem_rockchip_otp snd_soc_rockchip_i2s_tdm snd_soc_hdmi_codec snd_soc_simple_card mc snd_soc_simple_card_utils snd_soc_core snd_compress ac97_bus snd_pcm_dmaengine snd_pcm snd_timer snd soundcore dm_mod ip_tables x_tables autofs4 dw_hdmi_qp_i2s_audio dw_hdmi_qp_cec rk808_regulator rockchipdrm dw_mipi_dsi dw_hdmi_qp dw_hdmi analogix_dp drm_dma_helper fusb302 display_connector rk8xx_spi drm_display_helper phy_rockchip_snps_pcie3 phy_rockchip_samsung_hdptx_hdmi panthor tcpm rk8xx_core cec drm_gpuvm gpu_sched drm_kms_helper drm_shmem_helper drm_exec r8169 drm pwm_bl adc_keys >> [37743.041108] CPU: 2 PID: 5702 Comm: kworker/u16:8 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc1-edge-rockchip-rk3588 #2 >> [37743.041115] Hardware name: Rockchip RK3588 EVB1 V10 Board (DT) >> [37743.041120] Workqueue: panthor-cleanup panthor_vm_bind_job_cleanup_op_ctx_work [panthor] >> [37743.041151] pstate: 60400009 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) >> [37743.041157] pc : drm_gem_shmem_free+0x144/0x14c [drm_shmem_helper] >> [37743.041169] lr : drm_gem_shmem_free+0x144/0x14c [drm_shmem_helper] >> [37743.041181] sp : ffff80008d37bcc0 >> [37743.041184] x29: ffff80008d37bcc0 x28: ffff800081d379c0 x27: ffff800081d37000 >> [37743.041196] x26: ffff00019909a280 x25: ffff00019909a2c0 x24: ffff0001017a4c05 >> [37743.041206] x23: dead000000000100 x22: dead000000000122 x21: ffff0001627ac1a0 >> [37743.041217] x20: 0000000000000000 x19: ffff0001627ac000 x18: 0000000000000000 >> [37743.041227] x17: 000000040044ffff x16: 005000f2b5503510 x15: fffffffffff91b77 >> [37743.041238] x14: 0000000000000001 x13: 00000000000003c5 x12: 00000000ffffffea >> [37743.041248] x11: 00000000ffffdfff x10: 00000000ffffdfff x9 : ffff800081e0e818 >> [37743.041259] x8 : 000000000002ffe8 x7 : c0000000ffffdfff x6 : 00000000000affa8 >> [37743.041269] x5 : 0000000000001fff x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : ffff8000819a6008 >> [37743.041279] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : ffff00018465e900 >> [37743.041290] Call trace: >> [37743.041293] drm_gem_shmem_free+0x144/0x14c [drm_shmem_helper] >> [37743.041306] panthor_gem_free_object+0x24/0xa0 [panthor] >> [37743.041321] drm_gem_object_free+0x1c/0x30 [drm] >> [37743.041452] panthor_vm_bo_put+0xc4/0x12c [panthor] >> [37743.041475] panthor_vm_cleanup_op_ctx.constprop.0+0xb0/0x104 [panthor] >> [37743.041491] panthor_vm_bind_job_cleanup_op_ctx_work+0x28/0xd0 [panthor] > >Ok, I think I found the culprit: there's a race between >the drm_gpuvm_bo_put() call in panthor_vm_bo_put() and the list >iteration done by drm_gpuvm_prepare_objects(). Because we're not >setting DRM_GPUVM_RESV_PROTECTED, the code goes through the 'lockless' >iteration loop, and takes/release a vm_bo ref at each iteration. This >means our 'were we the last vm_bo user?' test in panthor_vm_bo_put() >might return false even if we were actually the last user, and when >for_each_vm_bo_in_list() releases the ref it acquired, it not only leaks >the pin reference, thus leaving GEM pages pinned (which explains this >WARN_ON() splat), but it also calls drm_gpuvm_bo_destroy() in a path >where we don't hold the GPUVA list lock, which is bad. > >Long story short, I'll have to use DRM_GPUVM_RESV_PROTECTED, which is >fine because I'm deferring vm_bo removal to a work where taking the VM >resv lock is allowed. Since I was the one asking for this lockless >iterator in the first place, I wonder if we should kill that and make >DRM_GPUVM_RESV_PROTECTED the default (this would greatly simplify >the code). AFAICT, The PowerVR driver shouldn't be impacted because it's >using drm_gpuvm in synchronous mode only, and Xe already uses the >resv-protected mode. That leaves Nouveau, but IIRC, it's also doing VM >updates in the ioctl path. > >Danilo, any opinions? > >Andy, I pushed a new version to the panthor-next [1] and >panthor-next+rk3588 [2] branches. The fix I'm talking about is [3], but >you probably want to consider taking all the fixups in your branch.>Just for your info，After taking all the fixups in my branch，It has been running for 24 hours, and so far, this warning hasn't shown up.>Regards, > >Boris > >[1]https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/panfrost/linux/-/commits/panthor-next >[2]https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/panfrost/linux/-/commits/panthor-next+rk3588 >[3]https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/panfrost/linux/-/commit/df48c09662a403275e76e679ee004085badea7c1
