On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 04:16:58PM -0600, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 05:38:16PM +0100, Thomas Hellström wrote:
On 1/17/24 13:27, Thomas Hellström wrote:
On 1/17/24 11:47, Thomas Hellström wrote:
Hi, Christian
Xe changes look good. Will send the series to xe ci to check for
regressions.
Hmm, there are some checkpatch warnings about author / SOB email
mismatch,
With those fixed, this patch is
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
it actually broke drm-tip now that this is merged:
../drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c:41:10: error: ‘struct ttm_placement’ has no member named ‘num_busy_placement’; did you mean ‘num_placement’
41 | .num_busy_placement = 1,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| num_placement
../drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c:41:31: error: excess elements in struct initializer [-Werror]
41 | .num_busy_placement = 1,
| ^
Apparently a conflict with another patch that got applied a few days
ago: a201c6ee37d6 ("drm/xe/bo: Evict VRAM to TT rather than to system")
oh, no... apparently that commit is from a long time ago. The problem
was that drm-misc-next was not yet in sync with drm-next. Thomas, do you
have a fixup for this to put in rerere?
Lucas De Marchi
