Hej Arnd,
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024, at 08:34, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2024, at 21:50, Janne Grunau wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 17, 2024, at 11:44, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>>
>>> -int parse_sample_rate_bit(struct dcp_parse_ctx *handle, unsigned int
>>> *ratebit)
>>> +static int parse_sample_rate_bit(struct dcp_parse_ctx *handle,
>>> unsigned int *ratebit)
>>> {
>>> s64 rate;
>>> int ret = parse_int(handle, &rate);
>>> @@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ int parse_sample_rate_bit(struct dcp_parse_ctx
>>> *handle, unsigned int *ratebit)
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> -int parse_sample_fmtbit(struct dcp_parse_ctx *handle, u64 *fmtbit)
>>> +static int parse_sample_fmtbit(struct dcp_parse_ctx *handle, u64 *fmtbit)
>>> {
>>> s64 sample_size;
>>> int ret = parse_int(handle, &sample_size);
>>
>> thanks, patch included in my dev branch and will be in the next pull
>> request I'll send to Hector.
>>
>> I suppose the recipients are generated by an automated
>> get_maintainers.pl invocation. Is that desired for out of tree drivers?
>
> I was wondering about that as well, as I don't usually send
> patches for code that isn't at least in linux-next yet.
>
> I ended up using what is in the MAINTAINERS file for this driver
> in the branch as that is is all I have at this point:
>
> APPLE DRM DISPLAY DRIVER
> M: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> L: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> S: Maintained
> T: git git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc
> F: drivers/gpu/drm/apple/
>
> I left out the drivers/gpu/ maintainer addresses though.
oops, answered to the wrong patch. The strscpy one has the drivers/gpu/ maintainers and the question. I replied here first assuming it has the same recipient list. I'd consider the recipients for this mail reasonable.
Janne
