On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@xxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Bryan, > > On Wed, 7 Aug 2013, Bryan Wu wrote: > >> Hi Guennadi and LMML, >> >> I'm working on a camera controller driver for Tegra, which is using >> soc_camera. But we also need to use Tegra specific host1x interface >> like syncpt APIs. >> >> Since host1x is quite Tegra specific framework which is in >> drivers/gpu/host1x and has several host1x's client driver like graphic >> 2D driver, my v4l2 soc_camera driver is also a host1x client driver. >> Right now host1x does not expose any global include header files like >> API in the kernel, because no other users. So we plan to put all >> host1x related driver together, is that OK for us to put our Tegra >> soc_camera driver into drivers/gpu/host1x/camera or similar? >> >> I guess besides it will introduce some extra maintenance it should be OK, right? > > Exactly, there's already been a precedent: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg56213.html > > It hasn't been finalised yet though. > OK, cool. I will try to provide the first version soon. Thanks a lot, -Bryan _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel