Hi Bryan, On Wed, 7 Aug 2013, Bryan Wu wrote: > Hi Guennadi and LMML, > > I'm working on a camera controller driver for Tegra, which is using > soc_camera. But we also need to use Tegra specific host1x interface > like syncpt APIs. > > Since host1x is quite Tegra specific framework which is in > drivers/gpu/host1x and has several host1x's client driver like graphic > 2D driver, my v4l2 soc_camera driver is also a host1x client driver. > Right now host1x does not expose any global include header files like > API in the kernel, because no other users. So we plan to put all > host1x related driver together, is that OK for us to put our Tegra > soc_camera driver into drivers/gpu/host1x/camera or similar? > > I guess besides it will introduce some extra maintenance it should be OK, right? Exactly, there's already been a precedent: http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg56213.html It hasn't been finalised yet though. Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D. Freelance Open-Source Software Developer http://www.open-technology.de/ _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel