On 15/01/2024 07:22, Vignesh Raman wrote:
Hi Rob,
On 12/01/24 22:44, Rob Clark wrote:
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 7:57 AM Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 3:42 AM Vignesh Raman
<vignesh.raman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Rob,
On 09/01/24 01:20, Rob Clark wrote:
From: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
The msm tests should skip on non-msm hw, so I think it should be
safe to
enable everywhere.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Helen Koike <helen.koike@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/ci/testlist.txt | 49
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ci/testlist.txt
b/drivers/gpu/drm/ci/testlist.txt
index f82cd90372f4..eaeb751bb0ad 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ci/testlist.txt
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ci/testlist.txt
@@ -2910,3 +2910,52 @@ kms_writeback@writeback-invalid-parameters
kms_writeback@writeback-fb-id
kms_writeback@writeback-check-output
prime_mmap_kms@buffer-sharing
+msm_shrink@copy-gpu-sanitycheck-8
+msm_shrink@copy-gpu-sanitycheck-32
+msm_shrink@copy-gpu-8
+msm_shrink@copy-gpu-32
+msm_shrink@copy-gpu-madvise-8
+msm_shrink@copy-gpu-madvise-32
+msm_shrink@copy-gpu-oom-8
+msm_shrink@copy-gpu-oom-32
+msm_shrink@copy-mmap-sanitycheck-8
+msm_shrink@copy-mmap-sanitycheck-32
+msm_shrink@copy-mmap-8
+msm_shrink@copy-mmap-32
+msm_shrink@copy-mmap-madvise-8
+msm_shrink@copy-mmap-madvise-32
+msm_shrink@copy-mmap-oom-8
+msm_shrink@copy-mmap-oom-32
+msm_shrink@copy-mmap-dmabuf-sanitycheck-8
+msm_shrink@copy-mmap-dmabuf-sanitycheck-32
+msm_shrink@copy-mmap-dmabuf-8
+msm_shrink@copy-mmap-dmabuf-32
+msm_shrink@copy-mmap-dmabuf-madvise-8
+msm_shrink@copy-mmap-dmabuf-madvise-32
+msm_shrink@copy-mmap-dmabuf-oom-8
+msm_shrink@copy-mmap-dmabuf-oom-32
+msm_mapping@ring
+msm_mapping@sqefw
+msm_mapping@shadow
+msm_submitoverhead@submitbench-10-bos
+msm_submitoverhead@submitbench-10-bos-no-implicit-sync
+msm_submitoverhead@submitbench-100-bos
+msm_submitoverhead@submitbench-100-bos-no-implicit-sync
+msm_submitoverhead@submitbench-250-bos
+msm_submitoverhead@submitbench-250-bos-no-implicit-sync
+msm_submitoverhead@submitbench-500-bos
+msm_submitoverhead@submitbench-500-bos-no-implicit-sync
+msm_submitoverhead@submitbench-1000-bos
+msm_submitoverhead@submitbench-1000-bos-no-implicit-sync
+msm_recovery@hangcheck
+msm_recovery@gpu-fault
+msm_recovery@gpu-fault-parallel
+msm_recovery@iova-fault
+msm_submit@empty-submit
+msm_submit@invalid-queue-submit
+msm_submit@invalid-flags-submit
+msm_submit@invalid-in-fence-submit
+msm_submit@invalid-duplicate-bo-submit
+msm_submit@invalid-cmd-idx-submit
+msm_submit@invalid-cmd-type-submit
+msm_submit@valid-submit
I tested this patch with latest drm-misc/drm-misc-next and there was
some failures seen for the newly added msm tests. I have updated the
xfails with below commit,
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/vigneshraman/linux/-/commit/d012893597a661d6ebbb755bf2607dfb055524a1
I will notify the maintainers about the flaky tests, update the url in
the flakes.txt, and submit a separate patch for this change.
Oh, you should probably move msm_mapping@* to skips on sdm845. I had
a closer look at those, and they are failing due to a bootloader/fw
issue. We work around this in mesa CI with these two patches:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux/-/commit/4b49f902ec6f2bb382cbbf489870573f4b43371e
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux/-/commit/38cdf4c5559771e2474ae0fecef8469f65147bc1
But given that sdm845 is similar to sc7180 as far as kernel gpu
driver, it is probably just better to skip these on sdm845 (with a
comment referring to the hack patches we use in mesa CI)
I have sent a patch with these changes,
Thanks!
Helen
https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20240115101750.27077-1-vignesh.raman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#u
Thanks.
Regards,
Vignesh
