Re: [PATCH libdrm 1/2] amdgpu: fix parameter of amdgpu_cs_ctx_create2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 08.01.24 um 10:40 schrieb Zhenneng Li:
In order to pass the correct priority parameter to the kernel,
we must change priority type from uint32_t to int32_t.

Hui what? Why should it matter if the parameter is signed or not?

That doesn't seem to make sense.

Regards,
Christian.


Signed-off-by: Zhenneng Li <lizhenneng@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  amdgpu/amdgpu.h    | 2 +-
  amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c | 2 +-
  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/amdgpu/amdgpu.h b/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
index 9bdbf366..f46753f3 100644
--- a/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
+++ b/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
@@ -896,7 +896,7 @@ int amdgpu_bo_list_update(amdgpu_bo_list_handle handle,
   *
  */
  int amdgpu_cs_ctx_create2(amdgpu_device_handle dev,
-			 uint32_t priority,
+			 int32_t priority,
  			 amdgpu_context_handle *context);
  /**
   * Create GPU execution Context
diff --git a/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c b/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c
index 49fc16c3..eb72c638 100644
--- a/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c
+++ b/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ static int amdgpu_cs_reset_sem(amdgpu_semaphore_handle sem);
   * \return  0 on success otherwise POSIX Error code
  */
  drm_public int amdgpu_cs_ctx_create2(amdgpu_device_handle dev,
-				     uint32_t priority,
+				     int32_t priority,
  				     amdgpu_context_handle *context)
  {
  	struct amdgpu_context *gpu_context;




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux