On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 1:21 AM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi--
>
> On 12/14/23 22:01, Ghanshyam Agrawal wrote:
> > Fixed multiple typos in vmwgfx_execbuf.c
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ghanshyam Agrawal <ghanshyam1898@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > V2:
> > Fixed some more typos suggested by codespell
> > and the community.
> >
> > V1:
> > Fixed multiple typos
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c | 8 ++++----
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c
> > index 36987ef3fc30..76aa72e8be73 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c
> > @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ struct vmw_ctx_validation_info {
> > * @func: Call-back to handle the command.
> > * @user_allow: Whether allowed from the execbuf ioctl.
> > * @gb_disable: Whether disabled if guest-backed objects are available.
> > - * @gb_enable: Whether enabled iff guest-backed objects are available.
> > + * @gb_enable: Whether enabled if guest-backed objects are available.
>
> "iff" normally means "if and only if" and its use in the kernel sources is
> usually not a mistake. However, this one sounds dodgy to me (before your change),
> so it's OK IMO. Also, the line above it uses "if" for a similar comment.
>
> Maybe someone else knows better.
Right, this one was "iff". I submitted a version of this without the
iff change to drm-misc-next.
z
