On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 11:07:03AM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Add a Device Tree binding schema for the OLED panels based on the > Solomon SSD133x family of controllers. > > Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > .../bindings/display/solomon,ssd133x.yaml | 63 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/solomon,ssd133x.yaml > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/solomon,ssd133x.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/solomon,ssd133x.yaml > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..eee8d8c9ca35 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/solomon,ssd133x.yaml > @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) > +%YAML 1.2 > +--- > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/solomon,ssd133x.yaml# > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > + > +title: Solomon SSD133x OLED Display Controllers > + > +maintainers: > + - Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@xxxxxxxxxx> > + > +properties: > + compatible: > + enum: > + - solomon,ssd1331 > + > +required: > + - compatible > + - reg > + > +allOf: > + - $ref: solomon,ssd-common.yaml# > + > + - if: > + properties: > + compatible: > + contains: > + const: solomon,ssd1331 > + then: > + properties: > + width: > + default: 96 > + height: > + default: 64 Do you envisage a rake of devices that are going to end up in this binding? Otherwise, why not unconditionally set the constraints? Cheers, Conor.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
