On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 08:34:00AM +0000, Sean Young wrote: > In order to introduce a pwm api which can be used from atomic context, > we will need two functions for applying pwm changes: > > int pwm_apply_might_sleep(struct pwm *, struct pwm_state *); > int pwm_apply_atomic(struct pwm *, struct pwm_state *); > > This commit just deals with renaming pwm_apply_state(), a following > commit will introduce the pwm_apply_atomic() function. > > Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> # for input > Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Sean Young <sean@xxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Several affected maintainers already acked, so I guess it's fine to take this via the pwm tree. An Ack from the remaining maintainers would be very welcome, an alternative would be to split the patch. Missing Acks so far: - Jean Delvare / Guenter Roeck for drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c - Javier Martinez Canillas for drivers/gpu/drm/solomon/ssd130x.c - Liam Girdwood / Mark Brown for drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c - Helge Deller for drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
