On Fri, Dec 8, 2023, at 06:04, Samuel Holland wrote: > On 2023-11-29 6:42 PM, Nathan Chancellor wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 02:23:01PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 07:05:15PM -0800, Samuel Holland wrote: >>>> RISC-V uses kernel_fpu_begin()/kernel_fpu_end() like several other >>>> architectures. Enabling hardware FP requires overriding the ISA string >>>> for the relevant compilation units. >>> >>> Ah yes, bringing the joy of frame-larger-than warnings to RISC-V: >>> ../drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn32/display_mode_vba_32.c:58:13: warning: stack frame size (2416) exceeds limit (2048) in 'DISPCLKDPPCLKDCFCLKDeepSleepPrefetchParametersWatermarksAndPerformanceCalculation' [-Wframe-larger-than] >> >> :( >> >>> Nathan, have you given up on these being sorted out? >> >> Does your configuration have KASAN (I don't think RISC-V supports >> KCSAN)? It is possible that dml/dcn32 needs something similar to commit >> 6740ec97bcdb ("drm/amd/display: Increase frame warning limit with KASAN >> or KCSAN in dml2")? >> >> I am not really interested in playing whack-a-mole with these warnings >> like I have done in the past for the reasons I outlined here: >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/20231019205117.GA839902@dev-arch.thelio-3990X/ > > I also see one of these with clang 17 even with KASAN disabled: > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn32/display_mode_vba_32.c:37:6: > warning: stack frame size (2208) exceeds limit (2048) in 'dml32_recalculate' > [-Wframe-larger-than] > void dml32_recalculate(struct display_mode_lib *mode_lib) > > ^ > 1532/2208 (69.38%) spills, 676/2208 (30.62%) variables > > So I'm in favor of just raising the limit for these files for clang, like you > suggested in the linked thread. How about just adding a BUG_ON(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV)) in that function? That should also avoid the build failure but give a better indication of where the problem is if someone actually runs into that function and triggers a runtime stack overflow. Arnd