On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 10:23:08AM +0100, Andi Shyti wrote: > Hi Thomas and Maxime, > > thanks for the answer, > > On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 10:10:55AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 10:09:46PM +0100, Andi Shyti wrote: > > > This is the second time I am resending this series in its v2. It > > > has been reviewd, acked, blessed, discussed, rectified, assessed, > > > authorized, validated, glorified, praised, demanded, approved, > > > and yet, I don't understand why no one is merging it. > > > > $ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f drivers/gpu/drm/i915/ > > Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (supporter:INTEL DRM DRIVERS (excluding Poulsbo, Moorestow...) > > Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (supporter:INTEL DRM DRIVERS (excluding Poulsbo, Moorestow...) > > Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> (supporter:INTEL DRM DRIVERS (excluding Poulsbo, Moorestow...) > > Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (supporter:INTEL DRM DRIVERS (excluding Poulsbo, Moorestow...) > > David Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:DRM DRIVERS) > > Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> (maintainer:DRM DRIVERS) > > intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (open list:INTEL DRM DRIVERS (excluding Poulsbo, Moorestow...) > > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (open list:DRM DRIVERS) > > linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (open list) > > > > You've Cc'd none of the i915 maintainers, that's why it's been stuck. > > > > Jani, Joonas, Rodrigo, Tvrtko, could you have a look at this? > > The main change here is in drm_print.h, though and there is just > an example of usage in i915. I though this should go through the > drm branch. > > Is it OK if I push it in drm-intel-next? Sure, and you can add my acked-by on the first Maxime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
