Re: [PATCH v8 0/8] Improve test coverage of TTM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Karolina and Christian,

> Karolina Stolarek (8):
>   drm/ttm/tests: Add tests for ttm_resource and ttm_sys_man
>   drm/ttm/tests: Add tests for ttm_tt
>   drm/ttm/tests: Add tests for ttm_bo functions
>   drm/ttm/tests: Fix argument in ttm_tt_kunit_init()
>   drm/ttm/tests: Use an init function from the helpers lib
>   drm/ttm/tests: Test simple BO creation and validation
>   drm/ttm/tests: Add tests with mock resource managers
>   drm/ttm/tests: Add test cases dependent on fence signaling

I see that all these files (and previous patches, as well) don't
have a consistent prefix system, like kunit_ttm_*. But they all
start with ttm_*, thread_*, drm_*, etc, which makes it a bit
difficult to follow and grep through.

Can we please maintain a consistent prefix system?

I know it looks bad to come out with it after this series (and
previous work too) has been out for several months already. I
need to say my "mea culpa" as well as I've been in the review
loop, as well.

Thanks,
Andi



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux