On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 at 09:07, Timur Tabi <ttabi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2023-12-05 at 08:55 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > +static int
> > +r535_gsp_msg_ucode_libos_print(void *priv, u32 fn, void *repv, u32 repc)
> > +{
> > + /* work out what we should do here. */
> > + return 0;
> > +}
>
> This is part of my logrm debugfs patch. It contains the printf log from a
> PMU exception.
>
> Do you want me to research the other two RPCs and tell you exactly what they
> do?
>
> But if you're not planning on actually doing anything with these RPCs, why
> add callbacks? Doesn't the driver already ignore RPCs it doesn't recognize?
The current code prints a message when we get a callback we don't
handle, this silences those, but maybe I should just silence them.
Dave.
