On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 07:54:31PM +0000, sarha@xxxxxxxx wrote: > November 28, 2023 at 6:49 PM, "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx mailto:u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx?to=%22Uwe%20Kleine-K%C3%B6nig%22%20%3Cu.kleine-koenig%40pengutronix.de%3E > wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 09:58:07AM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > > > > > > > > On 02/11/2023 18:56, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > > The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes > > > many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by > > > returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored > > > and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a > > > quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this > > > quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns > > > void. > > > [...] > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > This patch didn't make it into next yet. Who is responsible to pick this > > up? > > > > I expected the whole series had been applied at once. But yes, I can apply this patch. Thanks. Thomas wrote in https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/250b5d51-93f8-4d8c-8507-0c47adbf7237@xxxxxxx: Except for patches 8 and 16, I've pushed this patchset into drm-misc-next. . I understand he skipped patch 8, but for patch 16 I guess that's just an oversight. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
