Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Supporting GMEM (generalized memory management) for external memory devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Supporting GMEM (generalized memory management) for external memory devices
From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 15:55:28 +0100
Cc: "dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx" <linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx>, "leonro@xxxxxxxxxx" <leonro@xxxxxxxxxx>, "apopple@xxxxxxxxxx" <apopple@xxxxxxxxxx>, "amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "mgorman@xxxxxxx" <mgorman@xxxxxxx>, "ziy@xxxxxxxxxx" <ziy@xxxxxxxxxx>, "zhi.a.wang@xxxxxxxxx" <zhi.a.wang@xxxxxxxxx>, "rcampbell@xxxxxxxxxx" <rcampbell@xxxxxxxxxx>, "jgg@xxxxxxxxxx" <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>, "weixi.zhu@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <weixi.zhu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "jhubbard@xxxxxxxxxx" <jhubbard@xxxxxxxxxx>, "intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "mhairgrove@xxxxxxxxxx" <mhairgrove@xxxxxxxxxx>, "jglisse@xxxxxxxxxx" <jglisse@xxxxxxxxxx>, "rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx" <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>, "intel-gvt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <intel-gvt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Felix.Kuehling@xxxxxxx" <Felix.Kuehling@xxxxxxx>, "Xinhui.Pan@xxxxxxx" <Xinhui.Pan@xxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx" <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx>, "akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "ogabbay@xxxxxxxxxx" <ogabbay@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <a07fd33c6f9e44418c528de06f89707e@huawei.com>
Organization: Red Hat
References: <20231128125025.4449-1-weixi.zhu@huawei.com> <9308a79d-e312-4e6d-98fe-75dc6d0fbeda@amd.com> <CAPM=9tx-d-Au_bjX0vYxv6OwqiSjmbbMC7ebWpTsQgFNddWDuw@mail.gmail.com> <a07fd33c6f9e44418c528de06f89707e@huawei.com>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 29.11.23 09:27, zhuweixi wrote:

Glad to hear that more sharable code is desirable.
IMHO, for a common MM subsystem, it is more beneficial for
GMEM to extend core MM instead of building a separate one.


More core-mm complexity, awesome, we all love that! ;)

--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Supporting GMEM (generalized memory management) for external memory devices
  - From: zhuweixi

References:
- [RFC PATCH 0/6] Supporting GMEM (generalized memory management) for external memory devices
  - From: Weixi Zhu
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Supporting GMEM (generalized memory management) for external memory devices
  - From: Christian König
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Supporting GMEM (generalized memory management) for external memory devices
  - From: Dave Airlie
- RE: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Supporting GMEM (generalized memory management) for external memory devices
  - From: zhuweixi

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v1] drm/msm/dpu: improve DSC allocation
Next by Date: [PULL] drm-intel-fixes
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Supporting GMEM (generalized memory management) for external memory devices
Next by thread: RE: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Supporting GMEM (generalized memory management) for external memory devices
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux DRI Users] [Linux Intel Graphics] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86]