On 11/29/23 02:06, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
On 11/28/23 19:01, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
On 11/16/23 20:55, Timur Tabi wrote:
On Thu, 2023-11-16 at 20:45 +0100, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
As I already mentioned for Timur's patch [2], I'd prefer to get a fix
upstream
(meaning [1] in this case). Of course, that's probably more up to Timur to
tell
if this will work out.
Don't count on it.
I see. Well, I think it's fine. Once we implement a decent abstraction we likely
don't need those header files in the kernel anymore.
@Gustavo, if you agree I will discard the indentation change when applying the
patch to keep the diff as small as possible.
No problem.
Applied to drm-misc-fixes.
Thanks
--
Gustavo
