Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/sched: Reverse run-queue priority enumeration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 24.11.23 um 06:27 schrieb Luben Tuikov:
Reverse run-queue priority enumeration such that the higest priority is now 0,
and for each consecutive integer the prioirty diminishes.

Run-queues correspond to priorities. To an external observer a scheduler
created with a single run-queue, and another created with
DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_COUNT number of run-queues, should always schedule
sched->sched_rq[0] with the same "priority", as that index run-queue exists in
both schedulers, i.e. a scheduler with one run-queue or many. This patch makes
it so.

In other words, the "priority" of sched->sched_rq[n], n >= 0, is the same for
any scheduler created with any allowable number of run-queues (priorities), 0
to DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_COUNT.

Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: freedreno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Luben Tuikov <ltuikov89@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_job.c  |  2 +-
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.h            |  2 +-
  drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c |  7 ++++---
  drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c   | 15 +++++++--------
  include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h              |  6 +++---
  5 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_job.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_job.c
index 1a25931607c514..71a5cf37b472d4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_job.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_job.c
@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ void amdgpu_job_stop_all_jobs_on_sched(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
  	int i;
/* Signal all jobs not yet scheduled */
-	for (i = sched->num_rqs - 1; i >= DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_LOW; i--) {
+	for (i = DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_KERNEL; i < sched->num_rqs; i++) {
  		struct drm_sched_rq *rq = sched->sched_rq[i];
  		spin_lock(&rq->lock);
  		list_for_each_entry(s_entity, &rq->entities, list) {
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.h
index eb0c97433e5f8a..2bfcb222e35338 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.h
@@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ struct msm_gpu_perfcntr {
   * DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_KERNEL priority level is treated specially in some
   * cases, so we don't use it (no need for kernel generated jobs).
   */
-#define NR_SCHED_PRIORITIES (1 + DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_HIGH - DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_LOW)
+#define NR_SCHED_PRIORITIES (1 + DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_LOW - DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_HIGH)
/**
   * struct msm_file_private - per-drm_file context
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
index cb7445be3cbb4e..6e2b02e45e3a32 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
@@ -81,14 +81,15 @@ int drm_sched_entity_init(struct drm_sched_entity *entity,
  		 */
  		pr_warn("%s: called with uninitialized scheduler\n", __func__);
  	} else if (num_sched_list) {
-		/* The "priority" of an entity cannot exceed the number
-		 * of run-queues of a scheduler.
+		/* The "priority" of an entity cannot exceed the number of
+		 * run-queues of a scheduler. Choose the lowest priority
+		 * available.
  		 */
  		if (entity->priority >= sched_list[0]->num_rqs) {
  			drm_err(sched_list[0], "entity with out-of-bounds priority:%u num_rqs:%u\n",
  				entity->priority, sched_list[0]->num_rqs);
  			entity->priority = max_t(s32, (s32) sched_list[0]->num_rqs - 1,
-						 (s32) DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_LOW);
+						 (s32) DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_KERNEL);

That seems to be a no-op. You basically say max_T(.., num_rqs - 1, 0), this will always be num_rqs - 1

Apart from that looks good to me.

Christian.

  		}
  		entity->rq = sched_list[0]->sched_rq[entity->priority];
  	}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
index b6d7bc49ff6ef4..682aebe96db781 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
@@ -1051,8 +1051,9 @@ drm_sched_select_entity(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
  	struct drm_sched_entity *entity;
  	int i;
- /* Kernel run queue has higher priority than normal run queue*/
-	for (i = sched->num_rqs - 1; i >= DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_LOW; i--) {
+	/* Start with the highest priority.
+	 */
+	for (i = DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_KERNEL; i < sched->num_rqs; i++) {
  		entity = drm_sched_policy == DRM_SCHED_POLICY_FIFO ?
  			drm_sched_rq_select_entity_fifo(sched, sched->sched_rq[i]) :
  			drm_sched_rq_select_entity_rr(sched, sched->sched_rq[i]);
@@ -1291,7 +1292,7 @@ int drm_sched_init(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched,
  	if (!sched->sched_rq)
  		goto Out_free;
  	sched->num_rqs = num_rqs;
-	for (i = DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_LOW; i < sched->num_rqs; i++) {
+	for (i = DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_KERNEL; i < sched->num_rqs; i++) {
  		sched->sched_rq[i] = kzalloc(sizeof(*sched->sched_rq[i]), GFP_KERNEL);
  		if (!sched->sched_rq[i])
  			goto Out_unroll;
@@ -1312,7 +1313,7 @@ int drm_sched_init(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched,
  	sched->ready = true;
  	return 0;
  Out_unroll:
-	for (--i ; i >= DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_LOW; i--)
+	for (--i ; i >= DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_KERNEL; i--)
  		kfree(sched->sched_rq[i]);
  Out_free:
  	kfree(sched->sched_rq);
@@ -1338,7 +1339,7 @@ void drm_sched_fini(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
drm_sched_wqueue_stop(sched); - for (i = sched->num_rqs - 1; i >= DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_LOW; i--) {
+	for (i = DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_KERNEL; i < sched->num_rqs; i++) {
  		struct drm_sched_rq *rq = sched->sched_rq[i];
spin_lock(&rq->lock);
@@ -1390,9 +1391,7 @@ void drm_sched_increase_karma(struct drm_sched_job *bad)
  	if (bad->s_priority != DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_KERNEL) {
  		atomic_inc(&bad->karma);
- for (i = DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_LOW;
-		     i < min_t(typeof(sched->num_rqs), sched->num_rqs, DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_KERNEL);
-		     i++) {
+		for (i = DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_HIGH; i < sched->num_rqs; i++) {
  			struct drm_sched_rq *rq = sched->sched_rq[i];
spin_lock(&rq->lock);
diff --git a/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h b/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
index d8e2d84d9223e3..5acc64954a8830 100644
--- a/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
+++ b/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
@@ -63,10 +63,10 @@ struct drm_file;
   * to an array, and as such should start at 0.
   */
  enum drm_sched_priority {
-	DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_LOW,
-	DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_NORMAL,
-	DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_HIGH,
  	DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_KERNEL,
+	DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_HIGH,
+	DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_NORMAL,
+	DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_LOW,
DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_COUNT
  };




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux