On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 01:04:56 +0300
Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 11/10/23 13:53, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > Hm, there was no drm_gem_shmem_get_pages_sgt() call here, why should we
> > add a drm_gem_shmem_get_pages()? What we should do instead is add a
> > drm_gem_shmem_get_pages() for each drm_gem_shmem_get_pages_sgt() we
> > have in the driver (in panfrost_mmu_map()), and add
> > drm_gem_shmem_put_pages() calls where they are missing
> > (panfrost_mmu_unmap()).
> >
> >> + if (err)
> >> + goto err_free;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> return bo;
> >> +
> >> +err_free:
> >> + drm_gem_shmem_free(&bo->base);
> >> +
> >> + return ERR_PTR(err);
> >> }
> >>
> >> struct drm_gem_object *
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_mmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_mmu.c
> >> index 770dab1942c2..ac145a98377b 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_mmu.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_mmu.c
> >> @@ -504,7 +504,7 @@ static int panfrost_mmu_map_fault_addr(struct panfrost_device *pfdev, int as,
> >> if (IS_ERR(pages[i])) {
> >> ret = PTR_ERR(pages[i]);
> >> pages[i] = NULL;
> >> - goto err_pages;
> >> + goto err_unlock;
> >> }
> >> }
> >>
> >> @@ -512,7 +512,7 @@ static int panfrost_mmu_map_fault_addr(struct panfrost_device *pfdev, int as,
> >> ret = sg_alloc_table_from_pages(sgt, pages + page_offset,
> >> NUM_FAULT_PAGES, 0, SZ_2M, GFP_KERNEL);
> >> if (ret)
> >> - goto err_pages;
> >> + goto err_unlock;
> > Feels like the panfrost_gem_mapping object should hold a ref on the BO
> > pages, not the BO itself, because, ultimately, the user of the BO is
> > the GPU. This matches what I was saying about moving get/put_pages() to
> > panfrost_mmu_map/unmap(): everytime a panfrost_gem_mapping becomes
> > active, to want to take a pages ref, every time it becomes inactive,
> > you should release the pages ref.
>
> The panfrost_mmu_unmap() is also used by shrinker when BO is purged. I'm
> unhappy with how icky it all becomes if unmap is made to put pages.
Why, that's exactly what's supposed to happen. If you mmu_unmap(), that
means you no longer need the pages ref you got.
>
> Previously map() was implicitly allocating pages with get_sgt() and then
> pages were implicitly released by drm_gem_shmem_free(). A non-heap BO is
> mapped when it's created by Panfrost, hence the actual lifetime of pages
> is kept unchanged by this patch.
But the whole point of making it explicit is to control when pages are
needed or not, isn't it. The fact we mmu_map() the BO at open time, and
keep it mapped until it's not longer referenced is an implementation
choice, and I don't think having pages_put() in mmu_unmap() changes
that.
> The implicit allocation is turned into
> explicit one, i.e. pages are explicitly allocated before BO is mapped.
>
