On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 04:47:01PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > > > > On 12.11.23 01:46, Phillip Susi wrote: > > > I had been testing some things on a post 6.6-rc5 kernel for a week or > > > two and then when I pulled to a post 6.6 release kernel, I found that > > > system suspend was broken. It seems that the radeon driver failed to > > > suspend, leaving the display dead, the wayland display server hung, and > > > the system still running. I have been trying to bisect it for the last > > > few days and have only been able to narrow it down to the following 3 > > > commits: > > > > > > There are only 'skip'ped commits left to test. > > > The first bad commit could be any of: > > > 56e449603f0ac580700621a356d35d5716a62ce5 > > > c07bf1636f0005f9eb7956404490672286ea59d3 > > > b70438004a14f4d0f9890b3297cd66248728546c > > > We cannot bisect more! > > > > Hmm, not a single reply from the amdgpu folks. Wondering how we can > > encourage them to look into this. > > > > Phillip, reporting issues by mail should still work, but you might have > > more luck here, as that's where the amdgpu afaics prefer to track bugs: > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues > > > > When you file an issue there, please mention it here. > > > > Furthermore it might help if you could verify if 6.7-rc1 (or rc2, which > > comes out later today) or 6.6.2-rc1 improve things. > > It would also be good to test if reverting any of these is possible or not. > Hi Dave, AFAIK commit c07bf1636f0005 ("MAINTAINERS: Update the GPU Scheduler email") doesn't seem to do with this regression as it doesn't change any amdgpu code that may introduce the regression. Thanks. -- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
