Re: [PATCH] driver: gpu: Fixing warning directly dereferencing a rcu pointer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hey,

Den 2023-11-13 kl. 09:10, skrev Abhinav Singh:
This patch fixes a sparse warning with this message
"warning:dereference of noderef expression". In this context it means we
are dereferencing a __rcu tagged pointer directly.

We should not be directly dereferencing a rcu pointer, rather we should
be using rcu helper function rcu_dereferece() inside rcu read critical
section to get a normal pointer which can be dereferenced.

I tested with qemu with this command
qemu-system-x86_64 \
	-m 2G \
	-smp 2 \
	-kernel bzImage \
	-append "console=ttyS0 root=/dev/sda earlyprintk=serial net.ifnames=0" \
	-drive file=bullseye.img,format=raw \
	-net user,host=10.0.2.10,hostfwd=tcp:127.0.0.1:10021-:22 \
	-net nic,model=e1000 \
	-enable-kvm \
	-nographic \
	-pidfile vm.pid \
	2>&1 | tee vm.log
with lockdep enabled.

Signed-off-by: Abhinav Singh <singhabhinav9051571833@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv04_fence.c | 4 +++-
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv04_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv04_fence.c
index 5b71a5a5cd85..e62bad1ac720 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv04_fence.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv04_fence.c
@@ -39,7 +39,9 @@ struct nv04_fence_priv {
  static int
  nv04_fence_emit(struct nouveau_fence *fence)
  {
-	struct nvif_push *push = fence->channel->chan.push;
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	struct nvif_push *push = rcu_dereference(fence->channel)->chan.push;
+	rcu_read_unlock();
  	int ret = PUSH_WAIT(push, 2);
  	if (ret == 0) {
  		PUSH_NVSQ(push, NV_SW, 0x0150, fence->base.seqno);

I'm not an expert in nouveau fence channel lifetime, but I'm pretty sure this should probably be a rcu_dereference_protected, since a fence likely can't lose its channel before its command to signal is submitted.

But in case it's not, I would at least advise to check for fence->channel lifetime before submitting a patch like this. At least the original code warned about it not being 100% correct.

Cheers,

~Maarten




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux