Re: [PATCH 2/5] accel/ivpu: Do not use irqsave in ivpu_ipc_dispatch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] accel/ivpu: Do not use irqsave in ivpu_ipc_dispatch
From: Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 21:03:42 -0700
Cc: Stanislaw Gruszka <stanislaw.gruszka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20231107123514.2218850-3-jacek.lawrynowicz@linux.intel.com>
References: <20231107123514.2218850-1-jacek.lawrynowicz@linux.intel.com> <20231107123514.2218850-3-jacek.lawrynowicz@linux.intel.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.0

On 11/7/2023 5:35 AM, Jacek Lawrynowicz wrote:

From: Stanislaw Gruszka <stanislaw.gruszka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

ivpu_ipc_dispatch is always called with irqs disabled. Add lockdep
assertion and remove unneeded _irqsave/_irqrestore.

Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <stanislaw.gruszka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


Missing SOB.

-Jeff

References:
- [PATCH 0/5] accel/ivpu: Replace IPC kthread with threaded IRQ
  - From: Jacek Lawrynowicz
- [PATCH 2/5] accel/ivpu: Do not use irqsave in ivpu_ipc_dispatch
  - From: Jacek Lawrynowicz

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/5] accel/ivpu: Rename cons->rx_msg_lock
Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 08/12] net: support non paged skb frags
Previous by thread: [PATCH 2/5] accel/ivpu: Do not use irqsave in ivpu_ipc_dispatch
Next by thread: [PATCH 4/5] accel/ivpu: Use dedicated work for job timeout detection
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux DRI Users] [Linux Intel Graphics] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86]

Powered by Linux