Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/pm: replace 1-element arrays with flexible-array members

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2023-11-08 09:29, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 08:54:35AM +0200, José Pekkarinen wrote:
The following case seems to be safe to be replaced with a flexible array
to clean up the added coccinelle warning. This patch will just do it.

drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/smumgr/smu8_smumgr.h:76:38-63: WARNING use flexible-array member instead (https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays)

Signed-off-by: José Pekkarinen <jose.pekkarinen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/smumgr/smu8_smumgr.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/smumgr/smu8_smumgr.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/smumgr/smu8_smumgr.h
index c7b61222d258..1ce4087005f0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/smumgr/smu8_smumgr.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/smumgr/smu8_smumgr.h
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ struct smu8_register_index_data_pair {

 struct smu8_ih_meta_data {
 	uint32_t command;
-	struct smu8_register_index_data_pair register_index_value_pair[1];
+	struct smu8_register_index_data_pair register_index_value_pair[];

Did you just change this structure size without any need to change any
code as well?  How was this tested?

    I didn't find any use of that struct member, if I missed
something here, please let me know and I'll happily address any
needed further work.

    José.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux