On 11/8/2023 9:49 AM, Christian König wrote:
Am 08.11.23 um 13:58 schrieb Rajneesh Bhardwaj:
Try to allocate system memory on the NUMA node the device is closest to
and try to run delayed_delete workers on a CPU of this node as well.
To optimize the memory clearing operation when a TTM BO gets freed by
the delayed_delete worker, scheduling it closer to a NUMA node where the
memory was initially allocated helps avoid the cases where the worker
gets randomly scheduled on the CPU cores that are across interconnect
boundaries such as xGMI, PCIe etc.
This change helps USWC GTT allocations on NUMA systems (dGPU) and AMD
APU platforms such as GFXIP9.4.3.
Acked-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Rajneesh Bhardwaj <rajneesh.bhardwaj@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
Going to push this to drm-misc-next.
Thanks Christian, there is a new regression reported and I am checking
on that. Please don't submit it yet.
Thanks,
Christian.
---
Changes in v2:
- Absorbed the feedback provided by Christian in the commit message
and
the comment.
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 8 +++++++-
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_device.c | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
index 5757b9415e37..6f28a77a565b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
@@ -370,7 +370,13 @@ static void ttm_bo_release(struct kref *kref)
spin_unlock(&bo->bdev->lru_lock);
INIT_WORK(&bo->delayed_delete, ttm_bo_delayed_delete);
- queue_work(bdev->wq, &bo->delayed_delete);
+
+ /* Schedule the worker on the closest NUMA node. This
+ * improves performance since system memory might be
+ * cleared on free and that is best done on a CPU core
+ * close to it.
+ */
+ queue_work_node(bdev->pool.nid, bdev->wq,
&bo->delayed_delete);
return;
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_device.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_device.c
index 43e27ab77f95..72b81a2ee6c7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_device.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_device.c
@@ -213,7 +213,8 @@ int ttm_device_init(struct ttm_device *bdev,
struct ttm_device_funcs *funcs,
bdev->funcs = funcs;
ttm_sys_man_init(bdev);
- ttm_pool_init(&bdev->pool, dev, NUMA_NO_NODE, use_dma_alloc,
use_dma32);
+
+ ttm_pool_init(&bdev->pool, dev, dev_to_node(dev), use_dma_alloc,
use_dma32);
bdev->vma_manager = vma_manager;
spin_lock_init(&bdev->lru_lock);
