Re: [PATCH] drm: i915: Adapt to -Walloc-size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 07 Nov 2023, Sam James <sam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> GCC 14 introduces a new -Walloc-size included in -Wextra which errors out
> like:
> ```
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c: In function ‘eb_copy_relocations’:
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:1681:24: error: allocation of insufficient size ‘1’ for type ‘struct drm_i915_gem_relocation_entry’ with size ‘32’ [-Werror=alloc-size]
>  1681 |                 relocs = kvmalloc_array(size, 1, GFP_KERNEL);
>       |                        ^
>
> ```
>
> So, just swap the number of members and size arguments to match the prototype, as
> we're initialising 1 element of size `size`. GCC then sees we're not
> doing anything wrong.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@xxxxxxxxxx>

The short answer,

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>

but please read on.

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> index 683fd8d3151c..45b9d9e34b8b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> @@ -1678,7 +1678,7 @@ static int eb_copy_relocations(const struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
>  		urelocs = u64_to_user_ptr(eb->exec[i].relocs_ptr);
>  		size = nreloc * sizeof(*relocs);
>  
> -		relocs = kvmalloc_array(size, 1, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		relocs = kvmalloc_array(1, size, GFP_KERNEL);

Based on the patch context, we should really be calling:

	kvmalloc_array(nreloc, sizeof(*relocs), GFP_KERNEL);

and we'd get mul overflow checks too.

However, the code below also needs size, unless it's refactored to
operate on multiples of sizeof(*relocs) and it all gets a bit annoying.

Maybe there's a better way, but for the short term the patch at hand is
no worse than what we currently have, and it'll silence the warning, so
let's go with this.


>  		if (!relocs) {
>  			err = -ENOMEM;
>  			goto err;

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux