On 2023-11-07 20:03, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 11/7/23 09:26, José Pekkarinen wrote:
On 2023-11-07 16:08, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 11/7/23 00:29, José Pekkarinen wrote:
There is a couple of function return checks of functions that return
unsigned values, and local variables to hold them are also unsigned,
so
checking if they are negative will always return false. This patch
will
remove them, as well as the never reached code.
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/amdgpu_pm.c:2801:5-8: WARNING: Unsigned
expression compared with zero: val < 0
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/amdgpu_pm.c:2814:5-8: WARNING: Unsigned
expression compared with zero: val < 0
Signed-off-by: José Pekkarinen <jose.pekkarinen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/amdgpu_pm.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/amdgpu_pm.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/amdgpu_pm.c
index 8bb2da13826f..e7bb1d324084 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/amdgpu_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/amdgpu_pm.c
@@ -2798,8 +2798,6 @@ static ssize_t
amdgpu_hwmon_show_power_avg(struct device *dev,
unsigned int val;
val = amdgpu_hwmon_get_power(dev,
AMDGPU_PP_SENSOR_GPU_AVG_POWER);
- if (val < 0)
- return val;
This is reporting errors returned from amdgpu_hwmon_get_power() as
large integers.
Alright, that case it is a false positive, thanks for the
comment!
No, it isn't a false positive. The fix is wrong. The variable should be
declared
'int val', not 'unsigned int val'.
Sorry I may have missunderstood your comment, I certainly can do the
minor fix then.
Thanks!
José.
