On Mon, 2023-10-30 at 14:26 -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > > External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until > you have verified the sender or the content. > On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 06:00:09PM +0800, Moudy Ho wrote: > > Added the configuration for MT8195 RDMA. In comparison to MT8183, > it > > no longer shares SRAM with RSZ, and there are now preconfigured 5 > mbox. > > > > Signed-off-by: Moudy Ho <moudy.ho@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno < > angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > .../bindings/media/mediatek,mdp3-rdma.yaml | 26 > ++++++++++++++++++- > > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek,mdp3- > rdma.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek,mdp3- > rdma.yaml > > index c043204cf210..504334a76fb3 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek,mdp3- > rdma.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek,mdp3- > rdma.yaml > > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ properties: > > compatible: > > enum: > > - mediatek,mt8183-mdp3-rdma > > + - mediatek,mt8195-mdp3-rdma > > - mediatek,mt8195-vdo1-rdma > > > > reg: > > @@ -58,7 +59,7 @@ properties: > > > > mboxes: > > minItems: 1 > > - maxItems: 2 > > + maxItems: 5 > > > > interrupts: > > maxItems: 1 > > @@ -98,6 +99,29 @@ allOf: > > - mboxes > > - mediatek,gce-events > > > > + - if: > > + properties: > > + compatible: > > + contains: > > + const: mediatek,mt8195-mdp3-rdma > > + > > + then: > > + properties: > > + clocks: > > + items: > > + - description: RDMA clock > > + > > + mboxes: > > + items: > > + - description: used for 1st data pipe from RDMA > > + - description: used for 2nd data pipe from RDMA > > + - description: used for 3rd data pipe from RDMA > > + - description: used for 4th data pipe from RDMA > > + - description: used for the data pipe from SPLIT > > Following the prior comments, add these entries to the top-level > 'mboxes' and then here just put 'minItems: 5'. > > Rob Hi Rob, Thanks for assisting with the review and suggesting an improved method in patch [2/16] and here for bounding related item quantites. I have a question regarding the current item description. It seems to imply a specific order. If the order of the description is different for any reason, should it be fully re-listed under 'allOf'? Sincerely, Moudy
