Re: [PATCH v5 5/7] drm/sched: Split free_job into own work item

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2023-10-16 11:29, Luben Tuikov wrote:
> On 2023-10-16 11:12, Matthew Brost wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 08:09:31PM -0400, Luben Tuikov wrote:
>>> On 2023-10-13 22:49, Luben Tuikov wrote:
>>>> On 2023-10-11 19:58, Matthew Brost wrote:
>>>>> Rather than call free_job and run_job in same work item have a dedicated
>>>>> work item for each. This aligns with the design and intended use of work
>>>>> queues.
>>>>>
>>>>> v2:
>>>>>    - Test for DMA_FENCE_FLAG_TIMESTAMP_BIT before setting
>>>>>      timestamp in free_job() work item (Danilo)
>>>>> v3:
>>>>>   - Drop forward dec of drm_sched_select_entity (Boris)
>>>>>   - Return in drm_sched_run_job_work if entity NULL (Boris)
>>>>> v4:
>>>>>   - Replace dequeue with peek and invert logic (Luben)
>>>>>   - Wrap to 100 lines (Luben)
>>>>>   - Update comments for *_queue / *_queue_if_ready functions (Luben)
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> I wasn't able to apply this patch on top of drm-misc-next at a48e2cc92835fa.
>>>>
>>>> Create a branch off of a *clean* drm-misc-next and rebase/reapply/cherry-pick all
>>>> 7 patches on top of that clean drm-misc-next branch. You should also run
>>>> scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict on all your patches, or integrate it into the precommit
>>>> hook, see githooks(5), so you don't have to run it manually.
>>>>
>>>> Set format.useAutobase to whenAble somewhere in your Git configs (global/local),
>>>> or use --base=auto to git-format-patch when you format your patches before
>>>> git-send-email-ing them.
>>>>
>>>> Repost your patches.
>>>>
>>>> The base commit will be added to the bottom of the cover letter. It should
>>>> be an ancestor (or tip) of drm-misc-next (git branch --contains <base> --list etc.).
>>>> If it is not, your base tree wasn't clean, and you should redo this process.
>>>
>>> Poking around I found out that this patch set is based off of drm-misc-fixes.
>>> Had the base been included, it would've made this easier.
>>
>> I believe I based this off of drm-tip. Will follow the flow mentioned above in next rev.
> 
> Sure. You can use drm-tip, drm-misc-next, drm-misc-fixes, just make sure --base=auto
> is set as outlined above, and if you're including a cover letter (a free format text),
> you can mention the base branch in there too, even though useAutobase has included the SHA,
> it makes it easier.

Using -fixes or -tip is better as it includes Christian's dma_fence_timestamp() helper, and we want that in.
-- 
Regards,
Luben




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux