On 10/10/23 08:40, Thomas Hellström wrote:
On 10/9/23 01:32, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
Currently the DRM GPUVM offers common infrastructure to track GPU VA
allocations and mappings, generically connect GPU VA mappings to their
backing buffers and perform more complex mapping operations on the GPU VA
space.
However, there are more design patterns commonly used by drivers, which
can potentially be generalized in order to make the DRM GPUVM represent
a basis for GPU-VM implementations. In this context, this patch aims
at generalizing the following elements.
1) Provide a common dma-resv for GEM objects not being used outside of
this GPU-VM.
2) Provide tracking of external GEM objects (GEM objects which are
shared with other GPU-VMs).
3) Provide functions to efficiently lock all GEM objects dma-resv the
GPU-VM contains mappings of.
4) Provide tracking of evicted GEM objects the GPU-VM contains mappings
of, such that validation of evicted GEM objects is accelerated.
5) Provide some convinience functions for common patterns.
Big thanks to Boris Brezillon for his help to figure out locking for
drivers updating the GPU VA space within the fence signalling path.
Suggested-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@xxxxxxxxxx>
+/**
+ * drm_gpuvm_resv_add_fence - add fence to private and all extobj
+ * dma-resv
+ * @gpuvm: the &drm_gpuvm to add a fence to
+ * @exec: the &drm_exec locking context
+ * @fence: fence to add
+ * @private_usage: private dma-resv usage
+ * @extobj_usage: extobj dma-resv usage
+ */
+void
+drm_gpuvm_resv_add_fence(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm,
+ struct drm_exec *exec,
+ struct dma_fence *fence,
+ enum dma_resv_usage private_usage,
+ enum dma_resv_usage extobj_usage)
+{
+ struct drm_gem_object *obj;
+ unsigned long index;
+
+ drm_exec_for_each_locked_object(exec, index, obj) {
+ dma_resv_assert_held(obj->resv);
+ dma_resv_add_fence(obj->resv, fence,
+ drm_gpuvm_is_extobj(gpuvm, obj) ?
+ private_usage : extobj_usage);
It looks like private_usage and extobj_usage are mixed up above?
Good catch, will fix.
+ }
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(drm_gpuvm_resv_add_fence);
+
Thanks,
Thomas
