On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 7:35 AM Tvrtko Ursulin
<tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On 24/08/2023 12:35, Upadhyay, Tejas wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Tvrtko
> >> Ursulin
> >> Sent: Friday, July 7, 2023 6:32 PM
> >> To: Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Implement fdinfo memory stats
> >> printing
> >>
> >> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Use the newly added drm_print_memory_stats helper to show memory
> >> utilisation of our objects in drm/driver specific fdinfo output.
> >>
> >> To collect the stats we walk the per memory regions object lists and
> >> accumulate object size into the respective drm_memory_stats categories.
> >>
> >> Objects with multiple possible placements are reported in multiple regions for
> >> total and shared sizes, while other categories are counted only for the
> >> currently active region.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: Aravind Iddamsetty <aravind.iddamsetty@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drm_client.c | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 85 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drm_client.c
> >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drm_client.c
> >> index ffccb6239789..5c77d6987d90 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drm_client.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drm_client.c
> >> @@ -45,6 +45,89 @@ void __i915_drm_client_free(struct kref *kref) }
> >>
> >> #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
> >> +static void
> >> +obj_meminfo(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> >> + struct drm_memory_stats stats[INTEL_REGION_UNKNOWN]) {
> >> + struct intel_memory_region *mr;
> >> + u64 sz = obj->base.size;
> >> + enum intel_region_id id;
> >> + unsigned int i;
> >> +
> >> + /* Attribute size and shared to all possible memory regions. */
> >> + for (i = 0; i < obj->mm.n_placements; i++) {
> >> + mr = obj->mm.placements[i];
> >> + id = mr->id;
> >> +
> >> + if (obj->base.handle_count > 1)
> >> + stats[id].shared += sz;
> >> + else
> >> + stats[id].private += sz;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + /* Attribute other categories to only the current region. */
> >> + mr = obj->mm.region;
> >> + if (mr)
> >> + id = mr->id;
> >> + else
> >> + id = INTEL_REGION_SMEM;
> >> +
> >> + if (!obj->mm.n_placements) {
> >> + if (obj->base.handle_count > 1)
> >> + stats[id].shared += sz;
> >> + else
> >> + stats[id].private += sz;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + if (i915_gem_object_has_pages(obj)) {
> >> + stats[id].resident += sz;
> >> +
> >> + if (!dma_resv_test_signaled(obj->base.resv,
> >> + dma_resv_usage_rw(true)))
> >
> > Should not DMA_RESV_USAGE_BOOKKEEP also considered active (why only "rw")? Some app is syncing with syncjobs and has added dma_fence with DMA_RESV_USAGE_BOOKKEEP during execbuf while that BO is busy on waiting on work!
>
> Hmm do we have a path which adds DMA_RESV_USAGE_BOOKKEEP usage in execbuf?
>
> Rob, any comments here? Given how I basically lifted the logic from
> 686b21b5f6ca ("drm: Add fdinfo memory stats"), does it sound plausible
> to upgrade the test against all fences?
Yes, I think so.. I don't have any use for BOOKKEEP so I hadn't considered it
BR,
-R
>
> Regards,
>
> Tvrtko
>
> >> + stats[id].active += sz;
> >> + else if (i915_gem_object_is_shrinkable(obj) &&
> >> + obj->mm.madv == I915_MADV_DONTNEED)
> >> + stats[id].purgeable += sz;
> >> + }
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static void show_meminfo(struct drm_printer *p, struct drm_file *file)
> >> +{
> >> + struct drm_memory_stats stats[INTEL_REGION_UNKNOWN] = {};
> >> + struct drm_i915_file_private *fpriv = file->driver_priv;
> >> + struct i915_drm_client *client = fpriv->client;
> >> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = fpriv->i915;
> >> + struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
> >> + struct intel_memory_region *mr;
> >> + struct list_head *pos;
> >> + unsigned int id;
> >> +
> >> + /* Public objects. */
> >> + spin_lock(&file->table_lock);
> >> + idr_for_each_entry (&file->object_idr, obj, id)
> >> + obj_meminfo(obj, stats);
> >> + spin_unlock(&file->table_lock);
> >> +
> >> + /* Internal objects. */
> >> + rcu_read_lock();
> >> + list_for_each_rcu(pos, &client->objects_list) {
> >> + obj = i915_gem_object_get_rcu(list_entry(pos, typeof(*obj),
> >> + client_link));
> >> + if (!obj)
> >> + continue;
> >> + obj_meminfo(obj, stats);
> >> + i915_gem_object_put(obj);
> >> + }
> >> + rcu_read_unlock();
> >> +
> >> + for_each_memory_region(mr, i915, id)
> >> + drm_print_memory_stats(p,
> >> + &stats[id],
> >> + DRM_GEM_OBJECT_RESIDENT |
> >> + DRM_GEM_OBJECT_PURGEABLE,
> >> + mr->name);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> static const char * const uabi_class_names[] = {
> >> [I915_ENGINE_CLASS_RENDER] = "render",
> >> [I915_ENGINE_CLASS_COPY] = "copy",
> >> @@ -106,6 +189,8 @@ void i915_drm_client_fdinfo(struct drm_printer *p,
> >> struct drm_file *file)
> >> *
> >> ****************************************************************
> >> **
> >> */
> >>
> >> + show_meminfo(p, file);
> >> +
> >> if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) < 8)
> >> return;
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.39.2
> >
