On Mon, 18 Sept 2023 at 23:02, Helen Koike <helen.koike@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 14/09/2023 05:12, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Also yes how that landed without anyone running lockdep is ... not good. I > > guess we need a lockdep enabled drm ci target that runs vkms tests asap > > :-) > > btw, I just executed a draft version of vkms targed on the ci, we do get > the warning: > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/helen.fornazier/linux/-/jobs/49156305#L623 > > I'm just not sure if tests would fail (since it is a warning) and it has > a chance to be ignored if people don't look at the logs (unless if igt > already handles that). Hmm, dmesg-warn is already a separate igt test status. I guess it just needs to be handled explicitly. > I still need to do some adjustments (it seems the tests is hanging > somewhere and we got a timeout) but we should have vkms in drm ci soon. Might be due to the locking explosion? The kernels should probably have soft-lockup detection enabled as well as lockdep. Cheers, Daniel
