Maxime Ripard <mripard@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Hello Maxime,
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 07:29:25AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> static const struct drm_crtc_helper_funcs ssd130x_crtc_helper_funcs = {
>> .mode_valid = ssd130x_crtc_helper_mode_valid,
>> - .atomic_check = drm_crtc_helper_atomic_check,
>> + .atomic_check = ssd130x_crtc_helper_atomic_check,
>> };
>
> Sorry I didn't catch that sooner, but there's no reason to call that
> function a helper.
>
Yeah, agreed that there's no reason but others drivers already add the
_helper prefix for struct drm_*_helper_funcs callbacks, and I did that
in this driver as well to follow (what appears to be?) a convention.
So I've to that now for the struct drm_crtc_helper_funcs handlers to be
consistent with the rest of the driver, e.g for plane:
static const struct drm_plane_helper_funcs ssd130x_primary_plane_helper_funcs = {
DRM_GEM_SHADOW_PLANE_HELPER_FUNCS,
.atomic_check = ssd130x_primary_plane_helper_atomic_check,
.atomic_update = ssd130x_primary_plane_helper_atomic_update,
.atomic_disable = ssd130x_primary_plane_helper_atomic_disable,
};
static const struct drm_plane_funcs ssd130x_primary_plane_funcs = {
.update_plane = drm_atomic_helper_update_plane,
.disable_plane = drm_atomic_helper_disable_plane,
.reset = ssd130x_primary_plane_reset,
.atomic_duplicate_state = ssd130x_primary_plane_duplicate_state,
.atomic_destroy_state = ssd130x_primary_plane_destroy_state,
.destroy = drm_plane_cleanup,
};
> With that fixed (and feel free to fix while applying)
>
> Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Maxime
--
Best regards,
Javier Martinez Canillas
Core Platforms
Red Hat
