Hello, On Sat, Sep 09, 2023 at 04:38:28PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > >> struct pwm_device::pwm is a write-only variable in the pwm core and used > >> nowhere apart from this and another dev_dbg. So it isn't useful to > >> identify the used PWM. Emit the PWM's label instead in the debug > >> message. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > > > > Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Pushed to drm-misc (drm-misc-next). Thanks! JFTR: This patch is already in linus/master. And Javier pushed "drm/ssd130x: Print the PWM's label instead of its number" to drm-misc-next which is great. So the "Pushed to ..." mail is just in reply to the wrong patch in this thread and in git everything is fine. Thanks Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
